Xbox didn’t violate Google patent: ITU

Microsoft Corp won a round in a complex patent war on Thursday when the International Trade Commission said the company’s popular Xbox entertainment system did not violate a patent owned by Google subsidiary Motorola Mobility.

By - May 24, 2013
MIcrosoft new logo

Microsoft Corp won a round in a complex patent war on Thursday when the International Trade Commission said the company’s popular Xbox entertainment system did not violate a patent owned by Google subsidiary Motorola Mobility.

If the ITC had found that Microsoft infringed, it could have barred the Xbox from being imported into the United States.

The fight over the Xbox is related to a larger smartphone patent war between Apple, Microsoft and the mobile phone makers who use Google’s Android software, including Motorola Mobility.

Motorola Mobility originally accused Microsoft of infringing upon five patents when it filed its complaint in 2010. Four were dropped in ensuing months, leaving just one – a patent which allows devices to communicate wirelessly over short distances.

“This is a win for Xbox customers and confirms our view that Google had no grounds to block our products,” David Howard, a Microsoft deputy general counsel, said in a statement.

Motorola was “disappointed with this decision” and is evaluating its options, a company spokesman said in a statement.

Technology companies have spent billions of dollars to buy patent portfolios, and still more money litigating patent cases around the world.

The Xbox case has seen many twists and turns since it was filed in late 2010.

In April 2012, ITC Judge David Shaw said in a preliminary decision that Microsoft infringed four patents and did not infringe on a fifth. But instead of deciding the case, as is usual, in June 2012, the trade panel sent the case back to the judge for reconsideration.

In January, following an antitrust settlement with federal regulators, Google asked a trade panel to drop two patents from the complaint because they were essential to a standard. These types of patents ensure interoperability and get special treatment.

Google had promised the Federal Trade Commission that it would no longer request sales bans based on the infringement of standard essential patents.

By that time, just one patent remained. In March, an ITC judge said that Microsoft did not infringe that technology and recommended that the case be terminated. The full ITC followed that recommendation on Thursday.

More patent law news

Microsoft gets upper hand in Google patent trial

Apple wins patent violation dispute against Google

New Apple vs Samsung patent battle escalates

Apple trademarks design of Apple Store

Share your thoughts

Shutterstock is the image partner of MyBroadband – more technology images

Join the conversation

Connect with Us

androidappletwitterfacebookgoogleplusfeednewsletter

Poll

Have you ever received SMS "spam"?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

More News

Surprise twist in secret spy gadget investigation

Grabber

A new report reveals a twist in the secret spy gadget – used to intercept mobile communications – investigation.

Live streaming in South Africa: the content and cost game

ShowMax vs Netflix

Content and cost will determine the success of video-on-demand, which is coming of age in South Africa, writes Lynley Donnelly

Vodacom launches new LTE business broadband deals

Vodacom logo

Vodacom has launched new Broadband Connect LTE packages aimed at businesses, which feature a “double data” promotion.

Spam SMS – why South Africans pay to reply “Stop”

SMS worry

Recipients of SMS advertising do have the option to opt out – but they may have to pay to do so.

X

Newsletter Subscription


Name
Email *
Enter the following to confirm your subscription *
Captcha image


Free MyBroadband Newsletter
Subscribe
X