Xbox didn’t violate Google patent: ITU

Microsoft Corp won a round in a complex patent war on Thursday when the International Trade Commission said the company’s popular Xbox entertainment system did not violate a patent owned by Google subsidiary Motorola Mobility.

By - May 24, 2013 Share on LinkedIn
MIcrosoft new logo

Microsoft Corp won a round in a complex patent war on Thursday when the International Trade Commission said the company’s popular Xbox entertainment system did not violate a patent owned by Google subsidiary Motorola Mobility.

If the ITC had found that Microsoft infringed, it could have barred the Xbox from being imported into the United States.

The fight over the Xbox is related to a larger smartphone patent war between Apple, Microsoft and the mobile phone makers who use Google’s Android software, including Motorola Mobility.

Motorola Mobility originally accused Microsoft of infringing upon five patents when it filed its complaint in 2010. Four were dropped in ensuing months, leaving just one – a patent which allows devices to communicate wirelessly over short distances.

“This is a win for Xbox customers and confirms our view that Google had no grounds to block our products,” David Howard, a Microsoft deputy general counsel, said in a statement.

Motorola was “disappointed with this decision” and is evaluating its options, a company spokesman said in a statement.

Technology companies have spent billions of dollars to buy patent portfolios, and still more money litigating patent cases around the world.

The Xbox case has seen many twists and turns since it was filed in late 2010.

In April 2012, ITC Judge David Shaw said in a preliminary decision that Microsoft infringed four patents and did not infringe on a fifth. But instead of deciding the case, as is usual, in June 2012, the trade panel sent the case back to the judge for reconsideration.

In January, following an antitrust settlement with federal regulators, Google asked a trade panel to drop two patents from the complaint because they were essential to a standard. These types of patents ensure interoperability and get special treatment.

Google had promised the Federal Trade Commission that it would no longer request sales bans based on the infringement of standard essential patents.

By that time, just one patent remained. In March, an ITC judge said that Microsoft did not infringe that technology and recommended that the case be terminated. The full ITC followed that recommendation on Thursday.

More patent law news

Microsoft gets upper hand in Google patent trial

Apple wins patent violation dispute against Google

New Apple vs Samsung patent battle escalates

Apple trademarks design of Apple Store

Share your thoughts

Join the conversation

Connect with Us

androidappletwitterfacebookgoogleplusfeednewsletter

Poll

Do you buy mobile data bundles on a monthly basis?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

More News

Why you will pay more for your bank loan, car repayment this month

SA rand money

The National Credit Act’s changes to fees for credit agreements took effect on 6 May, meaning that this month will see many South Africans paying more for loan facilities.

Cybersmart Lightspeed – 300Mbps real-world speeds at less than R900 per month

Cybersmart Lightspeed

Cybersmart CEO Laurie Fialkov provides details about their Lightspeed fibre service, which offers excellent speeds at affordable prices.

Huge crackdown on Android-based “pirate” TV boxes

DroidTV MXIII

Scottish police have come down on sellers of Android-based media boxes that enable the illegal live streaming of sport.

Asus ZenFone 3 unveiled

ASUS ZenFone 3

Asus has revealed three Android Marshmallow smartphones in its new ZenFone 3 series.

X

Newsletter Subscription


Name
Email *
Enter the following to confirm your subscription *
Captcha image


Free MyBroadband Newsletter
Subscribe
×