DA to fight South African Internet Censorship Bill

The DA said it will fight clauses in the new FPB amendment bill which can result in a fine of up to R150,000 for Facebook or Twitter posts.

By - February 22, 2016 Share on LinkedIn
FPB Film and Publication Board

The DA intends to raise objections to a number of clauses in a bill intended to give the Films and Publications Board (FPB) wide-sweeping powers to censor the Internet.

The DA said that if the bill is pushed through Parliament without consideration, it will damage free speech.

Introduced in Parliament in November, the FBP Amendment Bill seeks to extend the reach of the FPB to include online content.

The FPB will also establish a “Penalty Committee” with powers to impose fines and criminal prosecution of those deemed to have contravened its provisions.

Fines up to R150,000 or imprisonment by a court of law for a person who “knowingly distributes, in any electronic medium, including the Internet and social networking sites, any film, game, or publication which advocates propaganda for war, incites violence, or advocates hate speech” is on the cards.

“Such wide-ranging powers of censorship over all social media posts need to be carefully considered and worded in such a way that it would prevent it being abused by the government to censor and curb free speech,” said the DA.

“A clear distinction must be made between free speech and hate speech as defined in the Constitution.”

The DA added that other problematic clauses of the Amendment Bill include:

  • S5 which gives the Minister the power to appoint the Penalty Committee in consultation with Cabinet. The Penalty Committee will have amongst other powers, the right to impose fines of up to R150,000 and refer cases for prosecution for contraventions of the FPB Act. A body with such powers should be appointed in consultation with Parliament, and not the Minister and Cabinet to prevent a situation where the Penalty Committee becomes a political hit-squad.
  • S6B(1) which gives the CEO of the FPB undue influence in deciding the sanctions of the Penalty Committee, as well as decisions for criminal prosecution. The Penalty Committee should remain entirely independent, and not operate under any influence of the CEO, to prevent bias, perceived or otherwise.
  • S18 usurps the powers of ICASA, and oversteps the FPB’s mandate, by stating that ICASA may not issue or renew any broadcasting licence to a broadcaster which also streams content through the Internet, unless such broadcaster is also registered with the Board as a distributor. This creates an unnecessary duplication of administration and regulation.

The DA did welcome that the Amendment Bill seeks to outlaw revenge porn.

More about online censorship

Internet censorship bill for South Africa has been approved by cabinet

Online censorship in South Africa – is it for the children?

Online content censorship in South Africa looms

Share your thoughts

Join the conversation

Connect with Us

androidappletwitterfacebookgoogleplusfeednewsletter

Poll

Do you buy mobile data bundles on a monthly basis?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

More News

R234,000 for a Twitter remote code execution vulnerability

Twitter on phone

Over the last two years, Twitter has paid out over R5 million to researchers who have reported bugs to the company.

Weak rand and movie price hikes in South Africa

Ster Kinekor logo

Ster-Kinekor has answered questions on how the weak rand will affect its annual price adjustments.

Asus launches Apple MacBook-beating ZenBook 3

Asus ZenBook 3

Asus has revealed its ZenBook 3 laptop, which weighs 900 grams and is 11.9mm thick.

Massive backlash against Windows 10 update

Windows 10 logo

Chinese users of Microsoft’s software have voiced their opposition to the company’s push to get them to upgrade to Windows 10.

X

Newsletter Subscription


Name
Email *
Enter the following to confirm your subscription *
Captcha image


Free MyBroadband Newsletter
Subscribe
×