DA to fight South African Internet Censorship Bill

The DA said it will fight clauses in the new FPB amendment bill which can result in a fine of up to R150,000 for Facebook or Twitter posts.

By - February 22, 2016 Share on LinkedIn
FPB Film and Publication Board

The DA intends to raise objections to a number of clauses in a bill intended to give the Films and Publications Board (FPB) wide-sweeping powers to censor the Internet.

The DA said that if the bill is pushed through Parliament without consideration, it will damage free speech.

Introduced in Parliament in November, the FBP Amendment Bill seeks to extend the reach of the FPB to include online content.

The FPB will also establish a “Penalty Committee” with powers to impose fines and criminal prosecution of those deemed to have contravened its provisions.

Fines up to R150,000 or imprisonment by a court of law for a person who “knowingly distributes, in any electronic medium, including the Internet and social networking sites, any film, game, or publication which advocates propaganda for war, incites violence, or advocates hate speech” is on the cards.

“Such wide-ranging powers of censorship over all social media posts need to be carefully considered and worded in such a way that it would prevent it being abused by the government to censor and curb free speech,” said the DA.

“A clear distinction must be made between free speech and hate speech as defined in the Constitution.”

The DA added that other problematic clauses of the Amendment Bill include:

  • S5 which gives the Minister the power to appoint the Penalty Committee in consultation with Cabinet. The Penalty Committee will have amongst other powers, the right to impose fines of up to R150,000 and refer cases for prosecution for contraventions of the FPB Act. A body with such powers should be appointed in consultation with Parliament, and not the Minister and Cabinet to prevent a situation where the Penalty Committee becomes a political hit-squad.
  • S6B(1) which gives the CEO of the FPB undue influence in deciding the sanctions of the Penalty Committee, as well as decisions for criminal prosecution. The Penalty Committee should remain entirely independent, and not operate under any influence of the CEO, to prevent bias, perceived or otherwise.
  • S18 usurps the powers of ICASA, and oversteps the FPB’s mandate, by stating that ICASA may not issue or renew any broadcasting licence to a broadcaster which also streams content through the Internet, unless such broadcaster is also registered with the Board as a distributor. This creates an unnecessary duplication of administration and regulation.

The DA did welcome that the Amendment Bill seeks to outlaw revenge porn.

More about online censorship

Internet censorship bill for South Africa has been approved by cabinet

Online censorship in South Africa – is it for the children?

Online content censorship in South Africa looms

Share your thoughts

Join the conversation

Connect with Us

androidappletwitterfacebookgoogleplusfeednewsletter

Poll

Would you prefer a 30-hour workweek for 75% pay, or a 40-hour week for full pay?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

More News

South African who bought cellphone spying machine charged

Grabber

Johannes Cronje, the Free State businessman who bought a cellphone spying device known as a grabber, has been charged by the state – despite being promised immunity.

Guptas to sell all their South African businesses

Gupta-2

The Gupta family has stated it plans to dispose of all the stakes it holds in South African businesses before the end of 2016.

Interview with the inventor of Apple’s first computer

Steve Wozniak

If you haven’t heard of Steve Wozniak, it is because he has been overshadowed by his fellow co-founder of Apple, Steve Jobs.

Ordering pizza online in South Africa

Pizza

We wanted pizza and we wanted to order it online – this is what South African franchises have to offer.

Free MyBroadband Newsletter
×