PDA

View Full Version : About Cosmetic Boobs and Blondes



Eugene66
18-01-2008, 11:35 AM
I wrote this a few years back to a beautiful "knockout" friend of mine who wanted to go for a boob op.

About boobs and blondes

You think of an actor like Dolly Parton or Loni Anderson and what is the first thing that comes to mind? Either blonde or big boobs. Every body has this idea that blondes are stupid. Dolly Parton is a clever lady. Just like Madonna she decided to cash in on whatever stirs in society. No ego just results. So what if the tribal consciousness jumps to their cameras and typewriters when we use what we have to create publicity and fame? That is the whole Idea.

Why am I writing all this? Because the other (female) half of our population seems to feel that these things are an asset too. And they will go to great lengths to try too appear similar.

My thoughts along these lines are always the same. Who are you? Are you someone who buys into media? You look at a movie comedy or add and you see this sophisticated man losing his head over a pair of boobs. How many men in real life fall for that? What type of man falls for that? Do you want that type of man in your life?

Why do some men fall for oversize boobs? I wish I knew. Show me the price of a mans car together with the size of his overdraft and I should be able to estimate the size of his ego. But boobs? All I can really tell you is that I never met an intellect that flips over a pair of boobs. In fact the most intellectual men I came across dislikes big ones. This to me is also not good in a sense that some females are born that way and we cannot really say that they are dim witted. The same as saying blondes are stupid. I’m sure there is stupid blondes out there somewhere but I haven’t met them yet.

Looking at a great pair of “knockers” I always think of the following. How do they function? How do they run? Same with long nails and long well styled hair. Are you good to look at and that’s where it ends? How many hours of your day do you waste making yourself impractical?:D

Just thinking of that has a very sexual attraction to me. Seeing her in a bath. Preparing for the day. But the other side of me wants to know whether once the loving and s*x are done. Can we have a deep discussion? Can we function and do things without breaking nails and spoiling hairstyles. Can we go and camp out in the bush? Or do I want a Barbie doll that’s good for s*x and beauty only? What am I going to do the rest of the time? Find someone else to work with?

The undertone in all of this is intimacy. Can I let you be you and enjoy you for everything that makes you unique? If the answer is no then I need to work on myself. We live in the illusion of separation. To appreciate that illusion we need to enjoy our uniqueness.

Personally I prefer small breasts. Thanking the universe that boobs are not all that important to me at all because I would have lost out on a lot of good people out there if that was my sole criteria. All my serious relations were with above medium sized women in that respect. I loved them with my all. Loved their breasts too. Even if it was a bit much for me.:D

Waaib
18-01-2008, 11:44 AM
So what size did she get?

Moederloos
18-01-2008, 11:45 AM
So what size did she get?

lol.

Big bouncy boobs be beautiful.

Eugene66
18-01-2008, 11:50 AM
So what size did she get? Lucky for her she didn't get them. She has beautiful boobs.:D

I peeked.:D

Xpilz
18-01-2008, 12:30 PM
nicely said
Euge

phenom
18-01-2008, 12:40 PM
isnt this a bad factor for natural selection? I may support genetic mods as long as they are well worked out, or even transplanting brains into designer clones to get rid of ugly people, or even cure to cure James blunt; NipTuck stuff will just make humans uglier in the long run.

Eugene66
18-01-2008, 12:49 PM
isnt this a bad factor for natural selection? I may support genetic mods as long as they are well worked out, or even transplanting brains into designer clones to get rid of ugly people, or even cure to cure James blunt; NipTuck stuff will just make humans uglier in the long run. Thanks Xpilz.
Orangeman. Do you really want to be with someone who is so set on her looks that she goes for an op? Ok some rare people need it due to accidents but mostly the needy ones need reductions.

If you think you are "Not ok" then what are you going to change next? Fact is, if you don't feel ok with yourself you shoud rather invest in a psychologist because you will then always feel inadequate in some way and your poor partner has to live with that.

The best people to be with are real people who says "get over it" instead of "poor me".

phenom
18-01-2008, 02:14 PM
Thanks Xpilz.
Orangeman. Do you really want to be with someone who is so set on her looks that she goes for an op? Ok some rare people need it due to accidents but mostly the needy ones need reductions.

If you think you are "Not ok" then what are you going to change next? Fact is, if you don't feel ok with yourself you shoud rather invest in a psychologist because you will then always feel inadequate in some way and your poor partner has to live with that.

The best people to be with are real people who says "get over it" instead of "poor me".

Thing is that if no one bred on looks, we would all look like apes, and if people continue to ignore this problem, future humans will be very ugly.

I don't mean to hate or treat ugly people any differently, but when it comes to making children with ugly people just because, just because i feel sorry for them, my children will then also be ugly, and if they do the same again, and everyone tries to make children with ugly people, everyone will eventually be ugly, their will be no beautiful people, that sux.

the only solution human beings need to do, is to find a way to cure all ugly peoople for them selves, but also, for the future of human kind.

yes i feel very sorry for ugly people, and I don't think it is fair that some ppl should have an disadvantage in life just because they are ugly, and niptuck will not save that problem in the long rn, because if an ugly person changes their looks with still keeping their genetics and then continues to make babies, the problem will creep up again, this has to stop at once for good, and for all future, we can't discriminate against ugly people, and because of DNA we cant breed with them either so the only so the only solution is if we could either change their DNA, or swop their bodies, through a future brain transplant or something, or some other system to curb the birthrate of ugly people, offering incentives to not have children?
i quik typed this incase u see grammer or spelling errors.

Pixie22
18-01-2008, 02:23 PM
Good looking people have good looking children?

Ugly people have ugly children?

I think its alot more random then that. Sorry man.

Monkeys find eachother attractive. Whats to say that we are not very ugly right now?
Well its all relative. Clearly. We only know what attractive and ugly is by comparison. If you think about woman from the 80's, they generally look cheap and not good looking by todays standards. But at the time they were thought of as "hot". Relative

phenom
18-01-2008, 02:54 PM
Good looking people have good looking children?

Ugly people have ugly children?
I think its alot more random then that.All eskimo's are ugly, and all have ugly children!
yes most of the time


Monkeys find eachother attractive. Whats to say that we are not very ugly right now?Are you suggesting we become monkeys? monkeys are intellectually inferior, and are better suited to their environment, if you want to be a monkey, then please separate yourself from society right now

Thing is that almost all people will agree that Angelina Jolie or Alecia Keys are sexy, while Celine Dion or Opera Winfrey are ugly

Pixie22
18-01-2008, 03:31 PM
you just aren't getting it. Its RELATIVE! In 100 years they will look at Angelina Jolie and be like "wtf lmao". Beauty is relative to society at the time. Beauty is also relative to the comparison of the average looking person, average attractive person and average ugly person at the time.

Monkeys are intellectually inferior? No **** i didn't know that. Thanks.

Good looks are alot more important to men because they are indicators of health which ensures healthy offspring. Woman base their attraction less on looks and more on survival value. That is they will go with the leader of the group (power, influence, protection) before they go for the good looking girly boy because it will ensure the survival of her young. They will go for the guy with social value and alot of friends before they go for the quiet loner. So your argument about natural selection being mostly based on looks is pretty flawed. We are still quite close to the mentality of monkeys. We have only recently decided to move even more towards looks as a priority, especially for woman who before hand didn't look to looks as a priority. So what you are saying rather is that we should move away from natural selection and base everything on looks.

You then suggest everyone is to get new bodies so that everyone is attractive. After a couple generations that will be a flop. By getting rid of "ugly", you are killing its opposite "beauty". We will not have a comparison. We would have killed the joy of attraction.

Eskimos are a race. Clearly their features dont fall into what the western world has called beautiful. Its relative again. White people tan to look less pasty. Japanese people walk around everywhere with an umbrella and stay out of the sun because for them, the more pasty, the more beautiful. Who is right? Thats an impossible question to answer.


"Thing is that almost all people will agree that Angelina Jolie or Alecia Keys are sexy, while Celine Dion or Opera Winfrey are ugly"

Um yeah captain obvious.. the last two are older and therefore less fertile, and yes they dont fall within the criteria of societies current idea of beauty..

Eugene66
18-01-2008, 06:20 PM
I don't know. I think beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

Eskimos look beautiful to each other and quite frankly most people look beautiful to me especially when they smile. I don't think we will evolve on the basis of looks but rather on practicality.

Even if we evolved on looks I don't think cosmetic surgery would speed it up.

Beer neither. LOL

Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder. Buuurrrrrrbbb LOL