PDA

View Full Version : Comms dept to sort out SNO first



dikbek
05-05-2004, 08:38 PM
By Paul Vecchiatto
Posted: 5 May 2004


Sorting out the stalled second national operator (SNO) process will probably be the first priority of the Department of Communications, followed by the Convergence Bill, a senior manager in the department has said.

Envir Fraser, senior manager for e-business in the Department of Communications, made the comment at a meeting of the Western Cape branch of the Internet Society last night.

"Right now the main priority of the department is to ensure the SNO issue is sorted out so we will probably only see the draft of the Convergence Bill going before Parliament late this year," Fraser said.

His comments were in response to questions and criticism of the draft Convergence Bill released in December 2003 in that it makes no mention of voice over IP (VOIP) and that it does not do much to consolidate the country's myriad telecoms-related laws.

During the meeting, M-Web director of regulatory issues Richard Heath levelled a series of criticisms at the department and in particular the Convergence Bill, which he said had failed to meet expectations.

"The Bill was disappointing in that it provided no roadmap for the liberalisation of the telecoms industry and has also allowed Telkom to so entrench itself in a monopolistic situation that foreign investors feel it would be unwise to take it on," he said.

Heath also said section 40 of the Telecoms Act artificially separated voice and data services and this was now an inhibitor to economic growth.

Many Internet Society members believe VOIP could help dramatically reduce input costs, particularly for small companies, which would then be more competitive in servicing overseas clients and so open up more markets and business opportunities.

African Internet activist Alan Levine said in his presentation that African countries were ignoring technologies such as VOIP "at their peril and that it was severe constraint on economic growth".

Fraser pointed out that the current government's mandate following the recent general elections was to alleviate poverty, and companies and organisations wanting to participate in the drafting of new Acts should bear this in mind.

onionpeel
05-05-2004, 09:51 PM
These are but some of the reasons why it took so long to get bidders for the SNO.

mbs
05-05-2004, 10:10 PM
Right. The last paragraph is also a tickler for those who support complete deregulation - would be useful to see motivated cases as to how this would be achieved in a deregulated telcoms economy. Could prove to be useful input for the DOC in their endeavours...

quik
06-05-2004, 12:38 AM
Tell me this, is the current situation with Telkom doing anything to alleviate poverty??, NO

Telkom are creating an elitist society of sickeningly wealthy shareholders while most people in South-Africa live below the poverty line.

So one could argue that a deregulated sector would just be changing the players, not the game. Although, at least with deregulation the wealth would be spread to much more people and keeping money in SA.

Does every Sector in the economy have to answer to the excuses of poverty, sacrificing the very ADVANCEMENT which could bring relief through a stronger economy. It's ridiculous. What's the point of government then since they don't take responsibility but instead blame all the sectors? Meanwhile we have to read about vast amounts of money being stolen through corruption. I read that R15billion was reported unaccounted for last year alone. That amount could probably rebuild Soweto as a posh neighbourhood, and then some...

Do these people not have a conscience ?

<font color="green">Video didn't kill the radio star...</font id="green"> <font color="red">Telkom did</font id="red">

BTTB
06-05-2004, 12:53 AM
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"> Tell me this, is the current situation with Telkom doing anything to alleviate poverty??, NO<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

They donated to R8.5 mil to PSA. Does that count. Personally I think it was merely an act of self preservation and PSA should not of accepted the money. Instead they should of given Telkom the boot. But try and tell PSA this. Tito Mboweni should seriously rethink Telkom's position in PSA as it makes a mockery of what they are trying to achieve.

<b><hr noshade size="1"></b><font size="2"><font color="red"><b>You can take Telkom out of the Post Office but you can't take the Post Office out of Telkom.</b></font id="red"></font id="size2">

onionpeel
06-05-2004, 12:37 PM
In Africa, it's all about filling one's own coffers at the expense of others. There is no accountability, no conscience and little interest in anything else but making (stealing?) money.

freeek
06-05-2004, 10:24 PM
I totally agree with you. Africa could be a thrieving continent but the politicians involved are always corrupted by money!

If you look at africa, in almost every country all the major industries are controlled by monopolies!

But one must not blame the monopolies alone, it is the governments fault! All their fault

..- dot dot dash ;)