PDA

View Full Version : Message Boards: The Role Of The Moderator : Article



antowan
16-12-2005, 11:36 AM
Message Boards: The Role Of The Moderator : Article


Most people have visited a message board at one time or another in their life. I would guess that the vast majority has never posted anything at all, preferring just to lurk (view) rather than to contribute their ideas and thoughts. Most of those that have contributed have posted useful input to discussions which are valued by many of the subscribers to the board.

It's the small minority, however, which has created the need for moderators. These are the people who read all of the articles and comments posted to a board and ensure that they are suitable for the audience.

Moderators are very necessary. If you've ever visited a board (or the near cousins: newsgroups and elists) which is not moderated, you know exactly what I mean. These often are filled with spam of the worst sort: silly money making programs and pornography. Quite often they degenerate into meaningless collections of junk visited by no one except automated spamming programs.

I always find it sad when I visit a board in this condition. I mean someone put some effort into creating a community on the web, then for whatever reason neglected or abandoned it. The truly sad boards are those that were obviously active, useful areas full of vibrant communications which have degenerated into uselessness. It's exactly the same feeling I get every time I visit the long abandoned Marineland in Southern California. Kind of an uncomfortable, ghost- town-like spookiness of the wrongness that permeates the area. What is the job of a moderator?

Some boards require user registration. In very strictly moderated boards, a moderator must approve each person who registers to access the board. This allows some measure of control over who can post. Security levels can further restrict what visitors can do. Good judgment in allowing people to join the group can obviate the need for extreme policing of postings. In other words, don't allow the bad apples into the barrel in the first place.

Postings are policed. You can have two forms of moderation. In one form, articles are posted automatically. They are reviewed by the moderator after they are posted to the board. Moderators can delete postings which do not measure up to board standards. Personally, I dislike this kind of moderation, since unnecessary postings are available for reading until the moderator reviews them.

In the second form, a moderator must review each posting before it appears on the board. This makes for a cleaner experience, although it demands a lot more work from the moderator.

Ensuring the board remains on-topic. The best message boards stick to one or more specific topics. A major job of a good moderator is to review postings to ensure that they are of the same subject as the board. At the very least, off-topic threads should be discouraged quickly or gently moved to other, more appropriate arenas.

Minimize flaming. Flames are critical or derogatory remarks. A flame war is kind of like a shouting match where insults are hurled between people until they all flee, exhausted and battered. Good moderators gently prod people into posting responsibly by discouraging flaming.

Eject troublemakers and spammers. As moderators read through postings, it can become obvious very quickly that there is a troublemaker in the group. These troublemakers need to be handled - either by gentle persuasion or more harsh measures if necessary. In fact, the moderator must be ready to eject severe troublemakers from the group if these people are continually causing problems.

The best boards are good because they remain on-topic and the communications between individuals is civil and useful. A good moderator works to ensure that this remains true so that everyone can benefit from the community as well as contribute to the discussions in an intelligent manner.

The best moderators work with the board members to create an environment which is enjoyable and beneficial to all. A bad moderator can produce the feeling that one is being watched by the Gestapo or secret police, where every word is watched and postings are often deleted without apparent cause or need.

Members of the board need to feel that their comments are desired and valued. Randomly deleting large numbers of postings for no apparent reason other than the moderator disagrees will certainly cause a board to become useless and empty of life. In fact, one of the things that can make a board truly outstanding is lively (not insulting or demeaning but lively) discussions about various topics.

And that's really the job of a board moderator. To ensure that the board remains viable, active and alive. To promote and ensure that an environment exists where people can post without threat or fear. And to be sure that disagreements do not flare into all-out warfare.

Richard Lowe Jr. http://www.internet-tips.net Richard Lowe Jr. is the webmaster of Internet Tips And Secrets. This website includes over 1,000 free articles to improve your internet profits, enjoyment and knowledge. Web Site Address: http://www.internet-tips.net Weekly newsletter: http://www.internet-tips.net/joinlist.htm Daily Tips: mailto:internet-tips@GetResponse.com

antowan
16-12-2005, 11:40 AM
Hi guys! I posted the above as some reading material for the folks who seem to have a lack of understanding as to what moderation of forums like this one is all about. Obviously Googling a bit for more info will broaden your perspective even more.

Happy reading!

Regards
Antowan

Person
24-01-2006, 05:53 PM
Hi guys! I posted the above as some reading material for the folks who seem to have a lack of understanding as to what moderation of forums like this one is all about. Obviously Googling a bit for more info will broaden your perspective even more.

Happy reading!

Regards
Antowan
Thats Quite a post there, some valid points brought up.

antowan
28-01-2006, 07:14 PM
You into random comments without substance Skeptik?

What exactly is you aiming to achieve?

neio
28-01-2006, 07:23 PM
good article.

antowan
28-01-2006, 07:23 PM
I have no agenda (someone else clearly does) but I may have one SOON the way things are going! Check your pm.

Is this an open threat? Please do clarify.

neio
28-01-2006, 07:25 PM
Can we please have a cool down period as well instead of outright banning?

neio
28-01-2006, 07:27 PM
i.e.
1 cool down period - 1 week
2 cool down period - 2 weeks
3 cool down period - 3 weeks
4 cool down period - permanent ban

Skeptik
28-01-2006, 08:06 PM
Great idea.

neio
28-01-2006, 10:09 PM
show us your muscles ic LOL!

Dude, what part of being a GUEST on this forum do you not understand|?

scatlett
28-01-2006, 10:11 PM
This can only end in tears. Lets ban him now and get it over with.

Angelo
14-06-2006, 02:06 PM
Has the "wait 30 seconds before you post" rule always been around?

kilo39
15-06-2006, 02:02 PM
Has the "wait 30 seconds before you post" rule always been around? Always - it's to get around the delay on the server - you think your post has been submitted but you're not sure so you click again - ergo - 2 of the same post - 30sec stops this.

antowan
15-06-2006, 05:13 PM
Always - it's to get around the delay on the server - you think your post has been submitted but you're not sure so you click again - ergo - 2 of the same post - 30sec stops this.

And it stops spamming of the forum, or at least slows possible such attacks down.

Angelo
17-06-2006, 01:49 AM
Thanks for your response guys.

PeterCH
03-05-2008, 01:22 PM
Message Boards: The Role Of The Moderator : Article


Richard Lowe Jr. http://www.internet-tips.net Richard Lowe Jr. is the webmaster of Internet Tips And Secrets. This website includes over 1,000 free articles to improve your internet profits, enjoyment and knowledge. Web Site Address: http://www.internet-tips.net Weekly newsletter: http://www.internet-tips.net/joinlist.htm Daily Tips: mailto:internet-tips@GetResponse.com

Sounds like this guy runs some sort of SEO firm. His article seems quite
arrogant though, he wants a forum where each post is read by a human first which IMHO would require either incredible delays or having paid full time mods doing this work. Unless you're running a really serious professional forum - and I've been on forums where professionals post and they don't do that either - the idea is rather ridiculous, it seems that someone takes his SEO/internet guru job a little too seriously (Mr Richard Lowe JR).

Palimino
29-05-2009, 11:33 AM
Message Boards: The Role Of The Moderator : Article



Good article – lot of truth there. However, there is an inordinate amount of veto power in the hands of the moderator. What if he/she is a martinet (forum Gestapo)? What if they are pushing a particular political agenda? And ban those who do not toe the line? Etc. etc. bla, bla.

What are the implications for ‘free speech’?

Jonny Two Shoes
29-05-2009, 01:07 PM
You have resurrected an old thread here but I think you have a valid point. One that has been argued before and resulted in a couple of other banishings :D in one particular case there were many members who did not want a specific person banned and they threatened to leave as a result but one can never be sure of their facts and who is really in the right I suppose :/

Free speech is a right but when it degrades the forum and is derogatory then there will be a conflict. Personally if someone here threatens me or calls me an idiot I would just laugh it off but not everyone is the same. I also reserve the right to state quite blatantly that "in my opinion" or "I think" someone or something is whatever I feel about it and I believe no one can argue because it is my opinion and can't be derogatory as I speak only on behalf of myself which in my opinion should be understood by any person with acceptable logic. :p

wrathex
30-05-2009, 08:22 AM
You have resurrected an old thread here but I think you have a valid point. One that has been argued before and resulted in a couple of other banishings :D in one particular case there were many members who did not want a specific person banned and they threatened to leave as a result but one can never be sure of their facts and who is really in the right I suppose :/

Free speech is a right but when it degrades the forum and is derogatory then there will be a conflict. Personally if someone here threatens me or calls me an idiot I would just laugh it off but not everyone is the same. I also reserve the right to state quite blatantly that "in my opinion" or "I think" someone or something is whatever I feel about it and I believe no one can argue because it is my opinion and can't be derogatory as I speak only on behalf of myself which in my opinion should be understood by any person with acceptable logic. :p

Intricate language semantics unfortunately is not a skill all users have. You and I might be able to use language to a highly skilled degree of correctness, but most don't or simply cannot.

I wrote a little article on Forum language use (http://wrathex.blogspot.com/2009/01/forum-language-use.html), to highlight the different responses you could get from a variety of personality types.

I think that online experience, broadmindedness and a good measure of patience and insightful understanding of the forum community makes for a good moderator.