Facebook   Twitter    e-mail newsletter    YouTube    RSS Feed    Android App    iPhone and iPad App     BlackBerry App    


Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Confusion sets in.

  1. #1

  2. #2
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    2,620

    Default

    And naturally the Telkom one is higher.... [:p]

  3. #3
    Active Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    South Africa.
    Posts
    99

    Default

    Unf telkom caps on their stats afaik.

  4. #4

    Default

    and why would you think the Telkom one is not right?

    ________________
    Hola Seven

  5. #5

    Default

    tiscali = good isp

    telkom = scum

    My choice on who to believe is easy.


  6. #6

    Default

    THEY DO ADD UP

    The short analysis:
    First: Discard the data from August 1. The data says that you had the luxury of a 27 hour day. Obviously the data is spurious!!

    Second: Recognise that the Telkom data is in Bytes and that the Tiscali data is in Kilo Bytes calculated at Bytes / 1024.

    So, take the Tiscali running total as at the 11th (start date) and subtract the transfer of the 1st.

    552 985 - 187 088 = 365 897 KBytes


    Add the Telkom daily combined amounts for the 2nd to the 11th
    and get 347 679 003 Bytes. Divide by 1024 and get 365 897 KBytes.

    Now 365 897 KBytes = 365 897 KBytes

    THEY DO ADD UP!

    Understadably the measurements are not synchronised. The difference of 2 055 KBytes on the 3rd is exactly matched by a balancing difference on the 4th. Similarly the difference on the 7th is balanced by the difference on the 8th. Small differences in the data can be attributed to rounding errors.


    THEY DO ADD UP

    As with all stats - look with care.


  7. #7

    Default

    hehe, told u I was confused :)

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •