Interesting.
Interesting.
My flickr
Are there any other websites that offer good reviews on DLSRs? I usually use dpreview.com and visit a few others, but how "reliable" is dpreview? Are they biased? So far I have based all my DLSR decisions on what I read on dpreview, but if they're not all that accurate, then I would like to read elsewhere.
We're all running on caveman software...My latest threadsI did not have NULL relations with that variable.
Have you guys seen:
http://photo.net
http://www.ephotozine.com
http://www.imaging-resource.com/
Last edited by mercurial; 17-11-2008 at 02:08 PM.
We're all running on caveman software...My latest threadsI did not have NULL relations with that variable.
Rule of thumb (for me at least): Ignore *all* subjective comments in any review. One man's "fiddly" is another man's "intuitive" - you know how it goes. Read the details that's irrefutable fact, look at the sample images, then go try it out.
dpreview is about the most detailed reviews out there. I find that after reading their reviews, I don't find anything else I haven't already read.
My flickr
Ok thanks. It's just a bit difficult to sometimes judge if what they are presenting are genuine, in terms of their samples etc... Most of their reviews indicates that Canon is better. Either that, or they are biased.
We're all running on caveman software...My latest threadsI did not have NULL relations with that variable.
When everyone has a public voice, we see how many people just don't have anything interesting to communicate
Sportslinks
We're all running on caveman software...My latest threadsI did not have NULL relations with that variable.
When I was looking for a camera (got it on saturday) I found out most demo models come with a 3 month warnt. Also IMO demo's are a bit of a safer buy unless you know the person atleast a little from which you are buying second hand(to be read as:"I don't know enough about cameras to tell when I am being BS'ed
).
Bebamos y divirtámonos que mañana moriremos.
Melior morior bellator, quam ago profugus.
Nemo saltat sobrius.
Photos updated 2012/06/08
I found an interesting site that shows the write speeds of various DSLRs. You can select your camera from a drop-down list and it shows you the speeds at which the cameras wrote the images to the memory cards. There are many different types of cameras and memory cards used.
http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/cam...?cid=6007-9257
EDIT: It basically shows you that those amazing speeds that they promise, are only when you are transferring the images from the camera to the pc. You will probably never get those speeds at writing to the camera.
Last edited by mercurial; 21-11-2008 at 08:18 AM.
We're all running on caveman software...My latest threadsI did not have NULL relations with that variable.
Don't see this one mentioned
http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/di..._reviews.shtml
We're all running on caveman software...My latest threadsI did not have NULL relations with that variable.
Does it matter which card reader I get? Will the speeds be slower if I get one of those that can read almost all different types of cards? Does the Extreme reader really perform better?
We're all running on caveman software...My latest threadsI did not have NULL relations with that variable.
The Extreme performs very well - better than the built-in all-in-one that my HP laptop had. Can't say much beyond that - I've only ever had this one and the built-in one.
My flickr
Cool.
We're all running on caveman software...My latest threadsI did not have NULL relations with that variable.
I handled a canon last night and I am happy that I went Nikon, was cool to have 15 focus points though![]()
Bebamos y divirtámonos que mañana moriremos.
Melior morior bellator, quam ago profugus.
Nemo saltat sobrius.
Photos updated 2012/06/08
Bookmarks