Where oh where has my bandwidth gone?
Slooooooow....
Ugh...
Where oh where has my bandwidth gone?
Slooooooow....
"Thou shalt not be a moron"
Really, if there was an 11th Commandment, that should be it.
www.johannmarx.com
****e
MTN 3G/HSDPA.
ment ****e
MTN 3G/HSDPA.
Just got home. It's really poor right now.
Very...
Just when we thought it was getting better
"Thou shalt not be a moron"
Really, if there was an 11th Commandment, that should be it.
www.johannmarx.com
Gone 6.30pm. And no improvement...
And combined the terrible speeds all day on the office Network...
Is anyone's connection cooking today?
no way guys....mine is flying. I dunno what to say.
Nothing on earth is new, just re-invented.
Mine's fine for a capped account, 9KB/s.
I'm going to become rich and famous after i invent a device that allows you to stab people in the face over the internet.
"Like a midget in a urinal I knew I had to be on my toes."
- Lt. Frank Drebin, from NAKED GUN
i`m supposed to be capped as well!!?! This is really strange.
Nothing on earth is new, just re-invented.
I presume everyone else has given this some speculative attention, anyways, assume that the story about serious 300:1 contention is true, i.e. not enough bandwidth available, and that is the reason for the additional 15Mb from IS.
That being the case, we also know that the WBS bandwidth management system is not working properly - evidence: some are getting more than 1Mbits/s, others [presumably lots if contention is 300:1] are getting sub dialup slowness - what that tells me is that bandwidth is not being shared properly, correct?
My conclusion: WBS' bandwidth management system is not working properly, or for that matter as advertised - for the moment put aside the question of whether it correctly counts & records the bytes transferred on your behalf.
My point: even if the IS pipe is in place tomorrow sometime, WBS still need to get their bandwidth management & sharing system sorted in order to fairly distribute up to 1Mbits/s to uncapped customers, and preferably a minimum of 64kBits/s to capped/throttled customers - otherwise we will continue playing Russian Roulette when connecting - if indeed the above assumptiousness has a shred of truth propping it up...
Trolls stab you in the back and bleed you dry like mosquitoes, and that's why I don't feed the BBL trolls with any new posts.
I totaly agree here with IC, you can own a dam, but if you dont know how to let out the water properly you create trickles and rivers.
my bw at this stage is the worst i have ever seen it.
thanks wbs but it seems like there is still a problem. please fix it.
Nice analogy WickedWeasel
I think you might be right IC... they're not giving everyone their fair share... and I'm the idiot that's getting the short end of the stick again
edit: I'm getting a blistering 2.6k on FTP - fcking ridiculous!
"Thou shalt not be a moron"
Really, if there was an 11th Commandment, that should be it.
www.johannmarx.com
given WBS doesn't seem to be metering usage properly, maybe their system is incorrectly reading some users as capped?
That may also help to explain why some are getting high speeds while others are getting crap?
Telkom. Yesterday Tomorrow.
it seems to be logical to conclude that. i know i have not reached my cap according to wbs and my own bw monitoring tools yet i am receiving 20KB/s or less where just yesterday and the days before speeds were outstanding.Originally Posted by lewstherin
is it not time wbs admit the problems and call in kyocera to help sort out problems. if this continues any longer iburst's image will be irreversibly damaged like another wireless company we all know.
my current speeds
local
170.9 Kbps
20.9 kBytes/sec
international
53.52 Kbps
6.69 KBps
if this continues i believe i shall migrate my money to a more stable and proven broadband offer.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks