Facebook   Twitter    e-mail newsletter    YouTube    RSS Feed    Android App    iPhone and iPad App     BlackBerry App    


Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: The World's Most Unreasonable Entrepreneurs

  1. #1
    Super Grandmaster
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Right here
    Posts
    6,554

    Default The World's Most Unreasonable Entrepreneurs

    http://www.inc.com/articles/2010/11/...epreneurs.html
    The founders of the Unreasonable Institute plan is fostering intense camaraderie among entrepreneurs who hope to solve the world's problems.

    I'm not sure which of the following is the most crazy:

    • A company that uses bicycles and motorcycles to power mobile-phone chargers and corn-shellers for the rural poor;

    • A company that sells environmentally sustainable toilet paper and uses the profits to fund water sanitation projects in the developing world;

    • Two young American women launching a reality TV show in Afghanistan to profile Afghani start-up entrepreneurs; or,

    • Presuming that you have what it takes to "accelerate ventures that future generations will remember as having defined progress in our time."

    It goes without saying that the founders of the first three ventures I describe—Global Cycle Solutions, Who Gives a Crap, and Bamyan Media—are some pretty audacious entrepreneurs, but the folks mentioned in Example No. 4, who brought the rest of them together last summer in Boulder, Colorado, are without doubt four of the most unreasonable entrepreneurs in the world.

    Daniel Epstein, Teju Ravilochan, Tyler Hartung, and Vladimir Dubovsky are the founders of an organization called the Unreasonable Institute and, as Donna Fenn has previously written on Inc.com, they have an absurd proposition: They think they know how to "give high-impact entrepreneurs wings." Led by philosopher-entrepreneur Epstein, the five twentysomethings justify the ridiculousness of their intention by quoting George Bernard Shaw: "The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man."

    Their particular unreasonable proposition? At the core of the Institute's work is the idea that you can actually empower and accelerate not-just-any fledgling company, but fledgling companies that purport to meet the real needs of no fewer than one million of the world's poorest, most disadvantaged, and excluded people. Now entering its second year, this audacious program is building a global network to scout and attract the attention of the world's most promising entrepreneurs.

    The requirements to qualify are three: You must have an idea that is "unreasonable," financially sustainable, and scalable to at least a million people. From this group, the Unreasonable Institute selects about fifty finalists to enter into "The Unreasonable Marketplace" — a website through which each candidate must prove his or her entrepreneurial muscle by attempting to raise the $10,000 it will cost to attend the Institute. But, it's not quite that simple. To avoid what Epstein calls the "rich uncle problem," finalists are limited to fundraising in $50 and $100 increments. The first twenty people to reach $10,000 get to go to Boulder.

    From there things don't get any more normal. The twenty qualifying entrepreneurs are shepherded into a vacant sorority house where they eat, work, and live together for eight weeks. There is no formal program, although a stream of more than fifty mentors, including Neal Baer (executive producer of Law & Order and ER), Marc Mathiew (founder of BeDo and former head of global brand marketing at Coca Cola) and Paul Polak (founder of D-Rev and author of Out of Poverty) will come to visit and teach the entrepreneurs for varying stretches of time. The entire experience is videotaped and disseminated to the world via "Unreasonable TV," and the project culminates with a 36-hour bus ride to Silicon Valley where the entrepreneurs "pitch" their ventures to a room full of potential funders.
    Click link for the rest of the article.
    Sounds awesome! I'd love to participate in this.
    That which comes into existence will eventually break apart and pass away

  2. #2

    Default

    Me too, but why is the topic so negative, it should be more positively labeled and not derogatively like "Unreasonable" ? :\

    http://unreasonableinstitute.org/the-team/


    They don't look too organised to me
    Last edited by Imminent; 27-11-2010 at 11:33 AM.

  3. #3
    Super Grandmaster
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Tiny cold island soon
    Posts
    6,524

    Default

    @Imminent:
    The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man."
    Unreasonable has now been redefined into something positive.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •