Facebook   Twitter    e-mail newsletter    YouTube    RSS Feed    Android App    iPhone and iPad App     BlackBerry App    


Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17

Thread: Jailbreaking, is it illegal

  1. #1

    Default Jailbreaking, is it illegal

    Because of the line of proffession I am in, I am often asked whether or not Jailbreaking your iPhone / iPad etc is illegal, and I simply answer them NO, it is not.

    So what exactly is Jailbreaking?

    Jailbreaking is the process of "hacking" an iDevice to free it from Apple’s limitations. There are lots of benefits to having a jailbroken iDevice.

    So is Jailbreaking Illegal?

    In July of 2010, the United States government ruled that jailbreaking is legal and and does not violate copyright, as long as the process isn’t being carried out with the intention of circumventing copyright. So Apple cannot sue users who have jailbrAoken their iDevices. Apple spokeswoman Natalie Kerris has however said that Apple won’t change its policy that voids iPhone warranties if a phone has been jailbroken. “It can violate the warranty and cause the iPhone to become unstable and not work reliably,” she said.

    So how do I Jailbreak my iDevice?

    So some of you might be asking yourselves so how do I Jailbreak my iDevice. Well the important thing to know is what processor you are using as well as what iOS you are running. The best place I can refer you to is http://www.spiritjb.org/ there you will find all the relevant documentation you will need to jailbreak your device.

    Using the correct jailbreak for your iDevice is very important. I recently came across someone whos friend tried to Jailbreak his iphone 4S and now when he switches his device on, he is left with a pineapple on his screen which means that his friend used the jailbreak for the iPhone 4 and not for the 4s. I was able to help him and get his iPhone 4s back to a working state, but it very important to ensure you know what iOS you have as well as Processor etc.

    If you are scared to Jailbreak you iDevice or you have "bricked" your iDevice, there are people out there that will do it for a fee, I am sure there is someone closeby that can help you.

    I hope that this has been a help.
    Computer Repairs Cape Town - We do our best to make sure that your computer problems don’t interfere with your business too much!

  2. #2

    Default

    Hi Jeinnor30,

    As far as I am aware, jailbreaking your phone is legal in the US, which is what you are referring to. However, whatever the Americans rule over there in their cases, really has no effect on us South Africans in terms of law, except maybe in a comparative interest way to see how we can deal with similar matter of law here.

    Since RICA came along, jailbreaking may well just be illegal since it actually makes it an offence to modify any cell phone's software. So I think technically, it is illegal to jailbreak an iphone.

    Here's a writeup about it:
    http://www.bitrepublic.co.za/2012/06...-south-africa/

    But as always, the fact that something is illegal, doesn't mean anyone is going to bother to enforce the law, how are cops going to know the difference between a jailbroken iphone or not? Besides, I think law enforcement have bigger things to worry about.

  3. #3
    Super Grandmaster Elimentals's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    PE
    Posts
    10,823
    Blog Entries
    8

    Default

    Its illeagael in SA plain and simple thanx to ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS AND TRANSACTIONS ACT. 2002

    86. Unauthorised access to, interception of or interference with data
    1. Subject to the Interception and Monitoring Prohibition Act, 1992 (Act No. 127 of 1992), a person who intentionally accesses or intercepts any data without authority or permission to do so, is guilty of an offence. 86.
    2. A person who intentionally and without authority to do so, interferes with data in a way which causes such data to be modified, destroyed or otherwise rendered ineffective, is guilty of an offence.
    3. A person who unlawfully produces, sells, offers to sell, procures for use, designs, adapts for use, distributes or possesses any device, including a computer program or a component, which is designed primarily to overcome security measures for the protection of data, or performs any of those acts with regard to a password, access code or any other similar kind of data with the intent to unlawfully utilise such item to contravene this section, is guilty of' an offence.
    4. A person who utilises any device or computer program mentioned in subsection (3) in order to unlawfully overcome security measures designed to protect such data or access thereto, is guilty of an offence.
    5. A person who commits any act described in this section with the intent to interfere with access to an information system so as to constitute a denial, including a partial denial, of service to legitimate users is guilty of an offence

    .
    But seeing that no one has been taken to court I guess we can just ignore it.
    .... and thanks for all the fish.

  4. #4
    Super Grandmaster ld13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Helderberg (Cape Town)
    Posts
    7,792
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CorporatePunk View Post
    Since RICA came along, jailbreaking may well just be illegal since it actually makes it an offence to modify any cell phone's software. So I think technically, it is illegal to jailbreak an iphone.
    It all depends on how you read and interpret it imo. I could argue that it is illegal ito RICA to cut your standard sim down to a micro sim. But that would be crazy. So I think, technically yes, it might be illegal to do a lot of stuff with your phone ... but the law does not concern itself with trifles - de minimis non curat lex.
    (Mandatory) . .

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Elimentals View Post
    Its illeagael in SA plain and simple thanx to ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS AND TRANSACTIONS ACT. 2002
    What happened there?

    Regardless, that bit of law is open to interpretation and, considering the section its under, seems to be about using a device or program to deny or intercept service to legitimate users i.e. hacking devices to gain access to private data and information.
    [Dropbox] | [GNU] | [Raptr] | [MyGaming]

  6. #6
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    2,286

    Default

    A person who utilises any device or computer program mentioned in subsection (3) in order to unlawfully overcome security measures designed to protect such data or access thereto, is guilty of an offence.
    This does not describe jailbreaking. You are not accessing data you are not authorised to by jailbreaking your own phone, since being your phone any data on it is generally yours and if it isn't then it is still irrelevant to jailbreaking.

    I see nothing there that concerns jailbreaking.

    As for this:
    54 (1) Any person who, intentionally and unlawfully, in any manner-

    (a) modifies, tampers with, alters, reconfigures or interferes with, any telecommunication equipment, including a cellular phone and a SIM- card, or any part thereof;

    (b) reverse engineers, decompiles, disassembles or interferes with, the software installed on any telecommunication equipment, including a cellular phone and a SIM-card, by the manufacturer thereof; or

    (c) allows any other person to perform any of the acts referred to in paragraph (a) or (b)
    Looks like that does indeed cover jailbreaking (as well as rooting and flashing custom firmware on Android/other devices).
    However, does it apply to devices you own?
    Also it doesn't say what constitutes "unlawfully". So if it's your own phone, is it 'unlawful'? I don't think so.
    Last edited by Maddmatt; 24-06-2012 at 02:46 AM.

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maddmatt View Post
    Looks like that does indeed cover jailbreaking (as well as rooting and flashing custom firmware on Android/other devices).
    However, does it apply to devices you own?
    Also it doesn't say what constitutes "unlawfully". So if it's your own phone, is it 'unlawful'? I don't think so.
    Yeah, I think even that is debatable and boils down to what, as you say, constitutes "unlawful" use. My guess is that it essentially implies altering a phone's IMEI (to bypass blacklisting) and acts like cloning SIM cards.

    Personal use/modification/alteration/configuration would still be protected.

    Especially since, if you take this law completely literally, it would be "unlawful" to so much as change the date on your phone
    [Dropbox] | [GNU] | [Raptr] | [MyGaming]

  8. #8
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    2,286

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lycanthrope View Post
    Personal use/modification/alteration/configuration would still be protected.

    Especially since, if you take this law completely literally, it would be "unlawful" to so much as change the date on your phone
    Yea. It seems like the people who write these laws are lacking in intelligence and/or common sense. I doubt it would be possible to even get someone charged for jailbreaking or installing custom firmware on their phone.
    They would have to be using it to re-activate a stolen phone, jam signals, illegally intercept other peoples calls or something.

  9. #9
    Super Grandmaster gregmcc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    127.0.0.1, United Kingdom
    Posts
    16,380

    Default

    I don't think anyone in SA have even been arrested for jailbreaking a device.

  10. #10
    Super Grandmaster bekdik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    I exist only in my own mind ...
    Posts
    9,938

    Default

    So if I:
    Replace my preinstalled Windows OS with Linux, I'm breaking the law.
    Replace my Windows XP with Windows 7, I'm breaking the law.
    Replace the firmware in my ISP locked modem with an unlocked version, I'm breaking the law.
    You only get one chance to piss off a client. After that they are an ex client ...

  11. #11
    Super Grandmaster Elimentals's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    PE
    Posts
    10,823
    Blog Entries
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bekdik View Post
    So if I:
    Replace my preinstalled Windows OS with Linux, I'm breaking the law.
    Replace my Windows XP with Windows 7, I'm breaking the law.
    Replace the firmware in my ISP locked modem with an unlocked version, I'm breaking the law.
    Depends if you have to break electronic protection to do it.

  12. #12
    Super Grandmaster sand_man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Johannesburg
    Posts
    14,201

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bekdik View Post
    So if I:
    Replace my preinstalled Windows OS with Linux, I'm breaking the law.
    Replace my Windows XP with Windows 7, I'm breaking the law.
    Replace the firmware in my ISP locked modem with an unlocked version, I'm breaking the law.
    Only on the modem if it were using a RICAed sim, surely?
    Every minute I stay in this room, I get weaker, and every minute Charlie squats in the bush, he gets stronger

  13. #13
    Resident Lead Bender Ockie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Henceforth AKA OckieMoto :-)
    Posts
    21,945

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Elimentals View Post
    Depends if you have to break electronic protection to do it.
    So in other words NO ONE should get laptops or PC's with that new planned Secure Boot crap?
    Now why you loer en kyk gelyk?
    Is ek miskien van goud gemake?

  14. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ocleroux View Post
    So in other words NO ONE should get laptops or PC's with that new planned Secure Boot crap?
    Thought about that.

  15. #15
    Super Grandmaster Elimentals's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    PE
    Posts
    10,823
    Blog Entries
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ocleroux View Post
    So in other words NO ONE should get laptops or PC's with that new planned Secure Boot crap?
    You don't need to break anything to turn off secure boot, just go into the bios and turn it off, so no issues here. Its not about the protection or security, its how you disable it.

    For example in the case of root. If the OEM gives you a way to do it its legal, Example Motorola, HTC and other have legal means to turn it off via the official websites BUT If you run illegal software (See hacked code) then it becomes illegal. The US included a fair use clause in the DMCA, SA do not have said clause in our copyright laws.

    Again I would stress not worry about it, the only time SA police ever acted was when people charged people to do it for them, see Xbox and PS3 protection.

    TL;DR
    Manufacturer give you permission, its cool. (You where given a key to open something)
    You don't have permission from the manufacturer, its not cool. (Breaking the lock)
    Last edited by Elimentals; 24-06-2012 at 11:19 AM.
    .... and thanks for all the fish.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •