Haha but seriously, how is creationism even taken seriously?
Haha but seriously, how is creationism even taken seriously?
One of the kids got married, to who? Wife must have come from powerpoint too.
Sent from my BlackBerry
1. Adam and Eve may not have been two beings, but representing a time where the human species was developed. For example, eating the fruit maybe meant that humans at that point gained a critical point of intelligence. It was the tree of knowledge.
2. I don't take 7 days to create the world literally, it's to illustrate a point and maybe each point in time of the earth's evolution.
3. Out of all mammals, which was the first actual mammal to have a belly button anyway? At some point one didn't have it, and another did. So it's not as simple as it sounds. What was the first instance of a primate? If it was the first instance, what was it's mother?
So ja, my 2c.
Need to analyse your company cell phone voice and data usage? Go to www.visibill.co.za for a solution.
http://www.answersingenesis.org/arti...when-was-curseThe Curse would have been fairly soon after the creation of Adam and Eve on Day 6 because it didn’t take long for them to sin (see When Did Adam and Eve Rebel?). We can do a basic calculation to arrive at the date of creation and Adam’s creation. The Curse must have been close to the same time. So, let’s calculate the date of creation.
Adam was created on Day 6, so there were 5 days before him. If we add up the dates from Adam to Abraham, we get about 2,000 years, using the Masoretic Hebrew text (which is the standard Hebrew text that most English translations are based on) of Genesis 5 and 11. 1 Whether Christian or secular, most scholars would agree that Abraham lived about 2,000 B.C. (4,000 years ago).
So, a simple calculation is:
5 days
+ ~2000 years
+ ~4000 years
_____________
~6000 years
At this point, the first five days are negligible. Quite a few people have done this calculation using the Masoretic text and, with careful attention to the biblical details, arrived at the same time frame of about 6,000 years, or about 4,000 B.C. Two of the most popular, and perhaps the best, are a recent work by Dr. Floyd Jones and a much earlier book by Archbishop James Ussher (1581–1656):
What I am getting at is; If you literally interpret the bible with regards to Adam and Eve, then surely it follows to literally interpret the generations that passed from them until Abraham, and from there to Jesus, giving a specific number.
Or is the bible incorrect?
Bookmarks