Facebook   Twitter    e-mail newsletter    YouTube    RSS Feed    Android App    iPhone and iPad App     BlackBerry App    


Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123 456 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 81

Thread: Do you remember the last whites-only referendum?

  1. #31
    Senior Member bluejhb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Some where over the Rainbow
    Posts
    319
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    One of my favorite house tunes *** GET OVER IT***

  2. #32
    Karmic Sangoma ghoti's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Hotel California
    Posts
    33,784
    Blog Entries
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by marine1 View Post
    You are delusional. Were you maybe born in the 90's?
    Wernt you born in the 90`s or the 80`s? He is spot on.
    I believe Ayn Rand's first love poem went: Roses are red, violets are blue, finish this poem yourself you dependent parasite".
    Colbert

  3. #33

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rorz0r View Post
    Wait 68% of the whites from 20 years ago voted against apartheid? But I thought they were all racist imperialists ?
    That was after 40 years of voting for apartheid, when the country was on the brink of collapse and civil war was imminent.

  4. #34

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joelus View Post
    That was after 40 years of voting for apartheid, when the country was on the brink of collapse and civil war was imminent.
    No, in reality it was just after readmission to international sport, of which we had been starved for ages...

  5. #35

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sinbad View Post
    Last Whites only referendum?

    Have we had another one since then? I don't recall one? So in actuality, it's Last Referendum.

    Which just goes to show, the government since 1994 doesn't actually give a toss what people want...
    Don't they have elections every five years? So they do care. Do you think people would vote any differently in a referendum?

    Referenda are not held for every government decision. Usually only for major constitutional change. In Australia there has only been one in the last 24 yrs- to establish a republic (not carried).

  6. #36
    Super Grandmaster
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Kent, UK
    Posts
    5,061

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sinbad View Post
    No, in reality it was just after readmission to international sport, of which we had been starved for ages...
    And the desire for some decent television. Dubbed German program's was driving us insane.

  7. #37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The_Librarian View Post
    Where the whites have to choose to continue the existing political policy of apartheid, or to discard it.

    Sadly, things have gone downhill from there...
    It was just a PR stunt to save YOUR butt.

    FYI,talks was already officially on,the "terrorist" parties were already unbanned, Mandela was already freed...and you still thought you voted "to end apartheid".

    It was a transitional period in which De Klerk prepared whites for the inevitable.He practically saved whites from themselves,and you all should thank him.It was a
    vote between change with peace or without it,either way,it was gonna happen.De Klerk effectively prevented a REAL revolution and Mandela made the biggest
    mistake of his life by negotiating the God given freedom of the oppressed majority.

    edit:BTW,that time there were roughly 10 million whites,2.8 million voted...it was 68% of 2.8 million,NOT the majority.
    Last edited by JustAsk; 09-08-2012 at 12:57 PM.
    "Never debate with an educated fool..."

  8. #38
    Super Grandmaster Nod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Nürnberg
    Posts
    6,737

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joelus View Post
    That was after 40 years of voting for apartheid, when the country was on the brink of collapse and civil war was imminent.
    Apartheid was not a political party ...

  9. #39

    Default

    People who honestly think that things are worse now than in apartheid have no idea what true suffering and oppression is.

  10. #40

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gamma guy View Post
    I really want the Democratic Alliance to win in 2014.
    There should be no winners in a representative democracy. A single party cannot represent the interest of more than 50% of the population, unless the population has as much personality as a paper bag.

    What exactly is the point of this thread?

  11. #41

    Default

    I wonder if the NATS were still in control whether we would have the internet? I recall as a kid my mum would listen to John Robbie on shortwave because chat radio was banned.

  12. #42

    Default

    There are lots of things we take for granted now that we would not have had if the NATS were still in power

  13. #43
    Super Grandmaster ToxicBunny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Alkie-Traz - Sponsored by SAB
    Posts
    32,081

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JustAsk View Post
    It was just a PR stunt to save YOUR butt.

    FYI,talks was already officially on,the "terrorist" parties were already unbanned, Mandela was already freed...and you still thought you voted "to end apartheid".

    It was a transitional period in which De Klerk prepared whites for the inevitable.He practically saved whites from themselves,and you all should thank him.It was a
    vote between change with peace or without it,either way,it was gonna happen.De Klerk effectively prevented a REAL revolution and Mandela made the biggest
    mistake of his life by negotiating the God given freedom of the oppressed majority.

    edit:BTW,that time there were roughly 10 million whites,2.8 million voted...it was 68% of 2.8 million,NOT the majority.
    Too much of funny.

    Yes the talks were already on, but that didn't mean apartheid was over, and yes there would have been civil war if it hadn't ended but it would have been messy and lots of people would have died but I doubt the ANC would have had a hope of winning.

    As for Mandela making the biggest mistake of his life, you go on believing that if you want, but the reality is he made the best choice possible for ALL the people of this country, what we have now unfortunately are a bunch of corrupt, criminal idiots in charge.
    Quote Originally Posted by Korn1 View Post
    I have been called a retard my whole life

  14. #44
    Super Grandmaster blunomore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Sandton, JHB
    Posts
    22,705

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The_Librarian View Post
    Where the whites have to choose to continue the existing political policy of apartheid, or to discard it.

    Sadly, things have gone downhill from there...
    Imagine what would have happened to this country if that referendum was never held and the apartheid govt just kept on trying to rule !!!

  15. #45

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JustAsk View Post
    It was just a PR stunt to save YOUR butt.
    Because remember people, this is the guy who said that Mandela should NEVER have negotiated with us pale skins. So consider yourselves lucky that you're breathing today!

    Quote Originally Posted by JustAsk View Post
    edit:BTW,that time there were roughly 10 million whites,2.8 million voted...it was 68% of 2.8 million,NOT the majority.
    Well...well...you seem to know you stuff with regard to these numbers. Mind telling us then, since you're convinced that it was NOT the majority, what percentage of the white population was not eligible to vote in this referendum (myself being one of them).

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123 456 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •