WHAT?!Originally Posted by JustAsk
You're being blatantly idiotic here by plainly ignoring the fact that a large percentage of the population COULD NOT VOTE - mainly due to being too young to vote. GEDDIT?
Ultimately your argument is completely invalid. Geddit?
Actually that comment was for the other oke .
Ignoring the insults...
Whites estimation in 1992 were a little more then 5 million.
At that time their life expectancy was around 73 average.
This is a group not known for many kids.
As per wiki 2.8 million voted...3.3million was registered.
Mostly older people vote,a global fact.
Your argument assuming that almost 2 million whites were children.Highly unlikely
"Never debate with an educated fool..."
Well, until you can tell us how many were children, I think it'd be wiser not to go around insinuating that that the majority of whites were not for change.
Ja, things would have been so much better if we kept the NAT's and apartheid in place.Where the whites have to choose to continue the existing political policy of apartheid, or to discard it.
Sadly, things have gone downhill from there...
Without insult and sorry however 'highly unlikely' is right up there with your other incorrect estimate.
Go and check the data.
Are you a coconut?
ZIM: African solutions to African problems
Well I was to young to remember it, but given all the propaganda at the time and the press being controlled by the Nats, I actually wonder how many whites really knew what they were voting for or what it was about.
Well show me the data.You just can't have a 5 million strong group with a life expectancy of average 73 at the time to have 2 million children.Dude,older people are the biggest voters,worldwide standard.Your argument also suggests that all adult whites registered.
"Never debate with an educated fool..."
Says who, you who said there were 10 million whites around the patch at the time?
I never said the figure was 2 million kids, you just did. I think though you will be surprised at what it is.
You have no decency to reference it yourself, you are just trolling now.
Last edited by Sneeky; 10-08-2012 at 08:03 PM.
Are you a coconut?
ZIM: African solutions to African problems
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/South...ferendum,_1992
85% turn out.
http://www.idea.int/vt/countryview.cfm?CountryCode=ZA
85% again in 1994
And in 2009 it declined to 56%
85% is not bad if you think about remote voting stations were not as wide spread as they are now.
No I'm not rude, just honest.
IT WAS 85% OF THE REGISTERED 3.3 MILLION VOTERS...2.8 MILLION
Last edited by JustAsk; 10-08-2012 at 08:42 PM.
"Never debate with an educated fool..."
Keep debating semantics...you're getting deperate.
"Never debate with an educated fool..."
Yeah, they should've let the unregistered voters vote too.
And you think there was 7 million unregistered voters?
No I'm not rude, just honest.
Another one...
"Never debate with an educated fool..."
Another one what?Another one...
No I'm not rude, just honest.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks