3D LED TV - which of these 4 would you prefer?

[TirNaNog]

I'm not really interested in a brand war - everyone has had good and bad experiences with every brand, but I guess what matters to me more is spec. Which would you buy and why do you think it's better? I think one is active and one is passive, and according to this:
http://www.displaymate.com/3D_TV_ShootOut_1.htm
...Passive is better!

TA!!

LG 42" + 9 pairs glasses 42lw4 R7699
HD TV 1080p
100Hz
Brightness (in cd/m²) 400
Contrast 7,000,000:1 (dynamic)
Speakers 10W + 10W Stereo
Noise reduction Enhanced Noise Reduction: 3D & MPEG
3 x HDMI
1 x USB 2.0
1 x Optical (digital audio output)
1 x SCART
1 x Component
1 x PC-in (D-Sub)
1 x PC Audio input
1 x Headphones
1 x CI Slot
DVB-T tuner
XD Engine
LED Plus
Aspect Ratio Correction
TruMotion™
Local Dimming
USB 2.0 input (JPEG, mp3, MPEG-4/DivX, Service)
Internet Services No

Samsung Slim 40" + 2 pairs of active glasses (additional @ R199 ea)UA40ES6200 R8999
3D compatibility/2D-3D converter
3D sound mode
3D HyperReal engine
Clear motion rate 400
100Hz Motion plus
Integrated Freeview/HD digital tuner
3x HDMI inputs
2x USB
LANv Dolby digital plus
SRS TheaterSound HD/dts 2.0
Integrated Wi-fi/Integrated Bluetooth
ConnectShare USB2.0 movie
All share play/Wi-fi direct
Full web browser
Full Smart TV functionality – Smart hub/Family story/ Fitness/Kids/Samsung Apps/ Your Video
Skype on Samsung TV
Extended PVR recording with EPG and time shift via USB

[SYNERGY]

I purchased the LG for 7.5k

Very satisfied with it

[waynehooper]

Do yourself a favour and have a look at at Samsung Plasma TV's as well. The picture quality is far superior and they work better with SD channels on DSTV.

[Rosaudio]

Defintely the one ith passive glasses

[TirNaNog]

Do yourself a favour and have a look at at Samsung Plasma TV's as well. The picture quality is far superior and they work better with SD channels on DSTV.

Hey Wayne! Thanks for the input. I have a plasma currently and am very happy with it except I'm going for the 3D now. I do like the lower power for the LED / less heat generated but yes, I agree plasmas produce great images. I'll take a second look at 3D plasmas.

[waynehooper]

The Plasma heat generation/Power usage issue is also a bit of a fallacy. They do use more power, but not a huge amount more. Also with Plasma's stick with Samsung as they have a screen shift feature built in which prevents screen "burn-in"

Hey Wayne! Thanks for the input. I have a plasma currently and am very happy with it except I'm going for the 3D now. I do like the lower power for the LED / less heat generated but yes, I agree plasmas produce great images. I'll take a second look at 3D plasmas.

[Dolby]

The shift feature has been available on a plasma screen for over a decade - they're not new. As you know, burn in has also been a part of plasma for over decade ...

[xodosman123]

Plasma is the way to go really but if you want a really good deal go to pnp northgate there is a 3d led tv there for 8000 game had it on special for 9999 normal price 14000 when I told the guy at game I could get the tv for that price he thought I was joking.

Be quick as this is a real deal I know about.

[wily me]

Hey Wayne! Thanks for the input. I have a plasma currently and am very happy with it except I'm going for the 3D now. I do like the lower power for the LED / less heat generated but yes, I agree plasmas produce great images. I'll take a second look at 3D plasmas.

If it is 3D passive go for it, if not do not waste your precious time.

[Mouse]

I purchased the LG for 7.5k

Very satisfied with it

+1
I have the LG 3D passive as well, and very satisfied with it

[PostmanPot]

I'm not really interested in a brand war - everyone has had good and bad experiences with every brand, but I guess what matters to me more is spec. Which would you buy and why do you think it's better? I think one is active and one is passive, and according to this:

What will you be using the TV for?

[Mr_Bee]

If it is 3D passive go for it, if not do not waste your precious time.

I second this 1 million % - You will cry a million tears unfortunately due to cost and pain and disappointment (and unpleasant surprises), if you buy active 3D. LG 3D Cinema is the best by far, no matter what you want to use it for since you wanna buy 3D. I have the LG 47" Model and couldn't be happier and my son loves playing Windows 3D games on it as well with everyone able to watch from anywhere.

[TirNaNog]

What will you be using the TV for?

Mostly movies, but I might consider some gaming.

[PhreeMe]

I second this 1 million % - You will cry a million tears unfortunately due to cost and pain and disappointment (and unpleasant surprises), if you buy active 3D. LG 3D Cinema is the best by far, no matter what you want to use it for since you wanna buy 3D. I have the LG 47" Model and couldn't be happier and my son loves playing Windows 3D games on it as well with everyone able to watch from anywhere.

I don't understand what the issue with active 3D's are, bar the price of the glasses. Before purchasing my Samsung D7000, I looked intensely into the LG Passives, as not only were they cheaper, but also "cinemascope". Looking at that playing the same 3D movie next to the D7000, disappointed me greatly. The movie was RE: Afterlife.... passive had decent popout where active was clearer and had a better defined 3D experience.

If you suffer with constant headaches, 3D either way isn't going to help. I use my TV for both 3D gaming (D3 I love you) and Blu-Rays and am happy. If money is your constraint, take a look at the Samsung D550 51" as it seems to be a generally rated very highly.

The above is largely what I noticed and my opinion. I researched everything I could for 9 - 10 months, went into different stores (this surprisingly can make a difference as setup is key) and asked to see the settings they were using to see if it was optimal (mostly not). I am no expert but have an eye for detail, which lead me to my purchase.

If you have any questions, I can answer as best I can.

[wily me]

I don't understand what the issue with active 3D's are, bar the price of the glasses. Before purchasing my Samsung D7000, I looked intensely into the LG Passives, as not only were they cheaper, but also "cinemascope". Looking at that playing the same 3D movie next to the D7000, disappointed me greatly. The movie was RE: Afterlife.... passive had decent popout where active was clearer and had a better defined 3D experience.

If you suffer with constant headaches, 3D either way isn't going to help. I use my TV for both 3D gaming (D3 I love you) and Blu-Rays and am happy. If money is your constraint, take a look at the Samsung D550 51" as it seems to be a generally rated very highly.

The above is largely what I noticed and my opinion. I researched everything I could for 9 - 10 months, went into different stores (this surprisingly can make a difference as setup is key) and asked to see the settings they were using to see if it was optimal (mostly not). I am no expert but have an eye for detail, which lead me to my purchase.

If you have any questions, I can answer as best I can.

Read, learn and enjoy. There are also many sites referring to the negative effects on health of the active glasses.

http://www.displaymate.com/3D_TV_ShootOut_1.htm