Well, sheep clearly!Originally Posted by buyeye
I really liked your post I thought I should bring it up.
But where can an atheist look for answers if not penguins?
Well, sheep clearly!I really liked your post I thought I should bring it up.
But where can an atheist look for answers if not penguins?
That which comes into existence will eventually break apart and pass away
That is the purview of the Australian and New Zealand heathens, I think.
I'm not exactly an expert on sheep, having never really been around them growing up. maybe it's the horns?
otherwise there isn't really homosexuality, necrophilia or pedophilia in nature to animals, they don't care about labels or how society see's them. it's just hanky spanky wherever they can get it
Hitler's like the Mickey Mouse of evil. Except Goofy is Goebbels and Minnie is on fire in a ditch.
Only if the sheep are ceilingcat's prophets.
You can't trust a meta-ethical moral relativist since such a person can abuse reason to justify any act.
Homosexual necrophilia duck. You were saying?
So that is where peeking duck comes from
Homosexual necrophilia duck. You were saying?
You can't trust a meta-ethical moral relativist since such a person can abuse reason to justify any act.
But why is it that you are trying to find a defence for your habits?
Homosexual necrophilia duck. You were saying?
Is it because they are wrong:
I and the voice inside my head(vis a vis my conscience) both agree that Jehovas partenalistic rulership is better than Satans liberal anarchy.
But why is it that you are trying to find a defence for your habits?
Is it because they are wrong:I'm neither homosexual, necrophiliac...nor a water bird. Anyway I'm not part of this thread or discussion, just had an image to share.
come ooon, with your expertise on beasiality you'd be fun to have around
Hitler's like the Mickey Mouse of evil. Except Goofy is Goebbels and Minnie is on fire in a ditch.
Wakakakakaaa....is the sound the ducks made when they saw mecome ooon, with your expertise on beasiality you'd be fun to have aroundcomingapproaching.
Did you see windowsill-hawk?
That which comes into existence will eventually break apart and pass away
Fair point. What everyone pointing at nature fails to mention is that there are hierarchies in packs. Often all the females belong to a single alpha male and nobody else is allowed to mate with them. The other hormone driven males have nowhere else to turn except other males. In other groups younger inexperienced males will also practice on each other before moving to older females. Nature is ruled by hormones, homosexuality is not a factor.
So what about all of the homosexual birds, fish, bears, tigers (the list can go on) who are not part of packs?
They are clearly bad role models.
That which comes into existence will eventually break apart and pass away
lol , some more info that would go against Swa's theory :
In a review article published in 2009, biologists Nathan Bailey and Marlene Zuk at the University of California, Riverside, noted that “many thousands of instances of same-sex courtship, pair bonding and copulation have been observed in a wide range of species, including mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, insects, mollusks and nematodes.”
Some animals, when given a choice, show a preference for the same sex.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks