'Jesus Of Nazareth' Proposed Film Angers Christians With Depiction Of Jesus As Result

[RazedInBlack]

You obviously don't even know enough to even intelligently reject Christianity. The Immaculate Conception does not refer to the way Jesus was conceived -- it took place a decade or two before Jesus was born.

---
As to whether or not this proposed film is objectionable to Christians: It is. But we've seen it all before. We will not riot or burn or slash or declare jihad. We will simply join our King in his prayer "Father, forgive them. They know not what they do".

Ouch! Ok a slap on the wrist was well taken.

So you are intelligent and you accept christianity . . . got it!

[CoolBug]

Think there's sufficient historic documents to support the fact that Jesus once roamed the earth.

Problem 1. No one who wrote about Jesus ever met him, anyone who wrote about Jesus came generations after Jesus.

Problem 2. There really is no evidence of Jesus, there is evidence of the Roman leader who supposedly listened to the Jews and sentenced him to crucifixion but that's as far as it goes for evidence for Jesus.

Of course there wouldn't be a corpse of Jesus, obviously... He flew up to heaven, the people who never met him even wrote about it so it had to of happened?

Problem 3. There are numerous other stories & Gods long before Jesus that quite literally have the same story as Jesus with different character names like, Dionysus, Horus, Osiris, Mithra, Krishna.

Here are 10 but if you look hard enough you could probably find 10 more given that there are & have been a ridiculous amount of deities.

http://listverse.com/2009/04/13/10-c...re-date-jesus/

Problem 4. We want to believe. We're Not Programmed to Seek "Truth," We're Programmed to "Win".

Not trying to bust anyone's bubble, he might have existed but what I've said above leads me to to think maybe not.