If travelling back in time was possible in some future date then we'd be seeing all these time travellers from the future in our own time. QED.Originally Posted by Friedpet
If travelling back in time was possible in some future date then we'd be seeing all these time travellers from the future in our own time. QED.
Another interesting paradox
http://curiosity.discovery.com/quest...e-change-event
I give you nogard for your examination? Quite possibly it has travelled back in time from an era where babies are fed hallucinogenic milk?
nogard travelled back 12 Monkeys style. Side effects include insanity.
I've made a huge mistake.
I just quoted you as I agree "time travel" to the future can be done. But traveling to the past is very unlikely.
Bebamos y divirtámonos que mañana moriremos.
Melior morior bellator, quam ago profugus.
Nemo saltat sobrius.
Photos updated 2012/06/08
How do you know you are not seeing time travellers from the future? I presume they look like us...
Do I contradict myself? Very well, then I contradict myself. I am large, I contain multitudes.
-Walt Whitman
See, look!
That which comes into existence will eventually break apart and pass away
It was a freakin' blast. Thanks man!This might be the right place to invite all you time travelers to our next annual meeting. It will be on two weeks ago in the usual dimension. PM me if you need directions
This might be the right place to invite all you time travelers to our next annual meeting. It will be on two weeks ago in the usual dimension. PM me if you need directions
And we will be debating Novikov's self-consistency principle, you might wanna read up on it
.... and thanks for all the fish.
You dont have to travel faster than the speed of light, traveling near light speed will send you to the future relative to everyone else on earth. FTL travel is impossible as far as we understand.Time is relative, an example I've heard of is to think about 3 points of a triangle, A, B & C now time is governed by the speed of light (according to something I saw on Discovery channel a while back)If you follow the speed of light from point A to B you are traveling normally, BUT If you travel faster than the speed of light from point B to C you are effectively going ahead in time, as you are beating light to its destination, but if you ask me that's looking it at face value as you are only beating the clock, not actual time/space
Was this guy in the clip explaining it
http://dsc.discovery.com/tv-shows/ot...ime-travel.htm
Tell that to the Tachyon particle.
As I understand faster than light travel: Say you watching a TV episode, now the broadcast travels at the speed of light so if you in a craft that travels faster than that speed you will "pick up" signals that has already been broadcasted making the program you watching appear to run in reverse. Its not like you can travel faster than the speed of light and still park on the same spot, besides same spot time travel would cause a whole nightmare of its own as the earth/galaxy and universe all move so if you jump back even 10 minutes you will land in empty space.
Worm holes and dimensional travel on the other hand is another means of travel but then the question begs if you truely traveling backwards or just stepping from one moving platform onto another and not changing the one your on direction.
.... and thanks for all the fish.
The tachyon particle is a completely hypothetical particle and there isn't a shred of evidence for its existence, ftl travel disobeys our laws of physics.
quantum physics disobeys the laws of physics, hence the search for a unified theory
.... and thanks for all the fish.
FTL will be discovered in South Africa, I'm convinced. Possibly in a taxi. Nowhere else are so many laws disregarded so quickly, why should physics be any different?
Where did they park the 2212 Chevy?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks