You can't trust a meta-ethical moral relativist since such a person can abuse reason to justify any act.
Absolutely. I love a good debate. I also think that 99% of religious posters have yet to honestly answer the question: why do I believe?". I just want an honest answer. Philosophical enough for you?
Wisdom is knowledge in practice. Knowledge comes from learning fact.. Philosophy pursues understanding in the absence of knowledge - a wannabe guide to wisdom. It has been superseded by science and fact. Philosophy is dead.
Peer review please.
I and the voice inside my head(vis a vis my conscience) both agree that Jehovas partenalistic rulership is better than Satans liberal anarchy.
If someone wants to make extraordinary claims the onus of truth lies squarely on his own shoulders. It isn't up to anyone else to prove/disprove your claims.
Awesome thread.
/sarcasm finish
Bookmarks