Oil and Coal is a net benefit, our modern civilization would collapse with out and we would go back to slavery, cutting down streets and destroying the amazon.
Extend it again, or just build a new one next to it?
If you want to take it down, use a diamond blood and a few explosives
or even better, put up a sign saying "beware of the dog" and turn parts of it into a Museum?
In Portugal they turned a coal plant on the river going into Lisbon into a Museam.
It's also worth noting that despite the Bollywood energie wende, Germany still consumes most of it's primary energy needs (not to be confused with electricity generation) from Fossil Fuels. Calling Biomass renewable is slightly dishonest.
now let's look at France.
I don't expect a Greenpeace funded organization to conclude anything else, the fact that they picked up the cracks speaks to the good practices and management standards, in many cases it's the pipes that need replacement. Hardly a major issue
Cracks occur all the time, it's about the size and...
It's worth noting that the Renewable Crowd never talks about decommissioning and a full life cycle analysis.
https://capitalmonitor.ai/factor/environmental/decommissioning-the-dark-heart-of-renewable-energy-finance/...
The lifespan can be extended for another 20 years,
other than that, just spend good money to build a new station? It's not that complicated! France still has cheaper electricity than German that made itself geopolitically dependent on Russian Gas.
A few years ago a bunch of Greenpeace activists...
France manage to build most of its reactors in 4-5 years, then the greenies came in trying to obstruct the process and convinced the government to go the other route. Now it takes longer.
If there is an elite buy in for a mass industrialisation plan then it can be quickly done.
In SA it's a...
but what factor? the panels are close to their physical limit,,
the amount of batteries in America can run the entire grid for a few minutes,
The Germans went that route and now they are burning more coal,
Nuclear Fusion is around 25 years away, Fission however makes sense, but ultimately SA...
"A comprehensive International Energy Agency report found that: “Nuclear thus remains the dispatchable low-carbon technology with the lowest expected costs in 2025. Only large hydro reservoirs can provide a similar contribution at comparable costs but remain highly dependent on the natural...