This is all for show. Wanatu has been operating for months already. Then they got some serious media attention, with just enough pushing on the right “racist” buttons to create a storm, and then the corrupt politicians had to act to show they are boss.
The operating permit thing is a long time ongoing issue. The department of transport is unable to issue permits in anything remotely resembling a reasonable timeframe, so loads of Ubers, Bolts, meter taxi’s and so forth also take their chances while waiting for the permits to be issued. As a rule, being able to show proof of having submitted and paid the application fee is sufficient, but a suitably difficult metro cop, who probably owns a few taxis himself, is able to change that tune on a whim.
The media is driving this “Afrikaans Only” drivel so hard as well. How is Wanatu Afrikaans only? The service is open to anyone, and the drivers can also speak English. But they operate in an area where Afrikaans is widely spoken by their customer base, and last time I checked Afrikaans is one of the national languages (3rd most common first language in South Africa, and probably firsts or second most common in their service area). So what does this have to do about race? How is a private company requiring drivers to be fluent in the most common languages spoken by the bulk of their clientele being racist?
Would it be racist if a similar service was started in Durban and required drivers to be fluent in isiZulu?