‘Unknown pneumonia’ deadlier than coronavirus sweeping Kazakhstan, Chinese embassy warns

Ockie

Resident Lead Bender
Joined
Feb 16, 2008
Messages
51,198
Mmmmm country that gave us COVID points at other country saying they have something even worse. Seems more like a diversion tactic. Hell, being China, I would not be surprised if this is another little "gift" they have been working on in one of their Wuhan labs and let loose in Kazakhstan to get the world to move their glaring eyes off Beijing.
 

Mystic Twilight

Expert Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2010
Messages
2,079
/looks at world map

Um. OK then....
It's the flavour of the year, same as american politics. If it's bad blame the democrats if its good praise the republicans, and vice versa. Insert some conspiracies in between.
 

eg2505

Honorary Master
Joined
Mar 12, 2008
Messages
18,197
knew this was going to happen, China decided that V1 of the virus was so effective at spreading , a Beta test if you will,
so time now to up the ante,

maybe mix in some population thinning measures into this new Virus?
thin out the herd as it were,
 

crocopede

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2015
Messages
586
How long would it take to analyze and collect data of an engineered virus if all tests had to be done ethically and in a controlled environment? I would assume a long time. The logistics and paper work to get volunteers to willingly subject themselves to a virus, and the amount of people you will need to establish the characteristics of said virus would bare astronomical costs, not to mention the moral ethics of said experiment.

The time frame is also significant. Now why not release said virus into the world? The benefits are you have 1000s of doctors doing the research on your behalf for free, and with such a large testing group, all variables come into effect. Its the greatest science experiment of our time.

If the goal is population control you obviously want to target the older generations and sickly people to thin out the herd. After you receive your results from months of feedback from all across the world you make the required changes to have a little more aggressive virus, fine tuned to thin the herd drastically.

Taking into consideration that we are overpopulated and already reached a point where machines and software can do so much, now would be the best time to thin out the world population. Majority of labor can already be replaced with software and hardware. Why even care about the millions of deaths if its for the greater good? Do you know those families being torn apart?

Wealth does impact empathy on a significant scale. I recall reading a published journal on how your brain is actually affected by having swaths of money. Your empathy basically dwindles down to see others as nothing more than ants.
 

eg2505

Honorary Master
Joined
Mar 12, 2008
Messages
18,197
@crocopede , your thinking exactly what I'm constantly thinking,
I actually forsee them deciding to sterilize populations and prevent population growth,
the possibilities are endless here, bio-weapon that cant be stopped or guarded against.

and most importantly nobody can blame them, plausible deniability if you will.
 

eg2505

Honorary Master
Joined
Mar 12, 2008
Messages
18,197
and here I thought "Children of men" was a work of fiction.
it seems to be coming true slowly but surely.

so when does society collapse in a gigantic heap?
and immigration to the UK become illegal? and Heavily Punished?
 

Shaun108

Executive Member
Joined
May 11, 2009
Messages
9,250
Didn't Borat learn anything in US and A?

  • Borat Sagdiyev: You will be my boyfriend.
  • Borat Sagdiyev: May George Bush drink the blood of every man woman and child in Iraq!
  • Borat Sagdiyev: Do your vagjin hang like sleeve of wizard?
  • Borat Sagdiyev: My name-a Borat!
 

Nanfeishen

Executive Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
7,941
If the goal is population control you obviously want to target the older generations and sickly people to thin out the herd. After you receive your results from months of feedback from all across the world you make the required changes to have a little more aggressive virus, fine tuned to thin the herd drastically.
Actualy for effective population control one has to target the breeding population, and neither Covid nor this new virus is doing that in any significant numbers.
 

crocopede

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2015
Messages
586
Actualy for effective population control one has to target the breeding population, and neither Covid nor this new virus is doing that in any significant numbers.
No. If you remove the breeding population you will end up removing too many humans and possibly cause the extinction of the human species. If there is no one to breed and you kill off majority of everyone you end up with a population that can no longer procreate nor sustain the world. It wont be able to recover.

Your preferred target would be to thin out the sick and elderly. There after a more aggressive strain to thin out people who are susceptible but not sickly. That way you got rid of the old and sickly, and also a few billion healthy people.
 

eg2505

Honorary Master
Joined
Mar 12, 2008
Messages
18,197
Your preferred target would be to thin out the sick and elderly. There after a more aggressive strain to thin out people who are susceptible but not sickly. That way you got rid of the old and sickly, and also a few billion healthy people.
How to take over the world, China edition.

I mean Nukes are too deadly and too much fallout and after effects,
what better to decimate the world population, a forced "sterilization" if you will.

laugh all you want, after seeing the effects of Covid, why not do it again?
just mix in some other worse things.
 

eg2505

Honorary Master
Joined
Mar 12, 2008
Messages
18,197
Whut?

Exactly how deadly do imagine COVID-19 to be?
the beta test of something worse,

yes some died, but as the majority of us got it (knowingly or not) and those of us Healthy to resist,
survived perfectly fine, (although a bit poorer for the experience).

a precursor to something much, much worse.
 

noxibox

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 6, 2005
Messages
18,941
2020 can stop it now. Now it's just becoming a pita rather than a difficult year.

Freaking fires, floods, rona, bubonic plague, bloody overachiever of a year.
Bubonic plague happens every year. Only reason it has made the news this year is because everyone is fixated on infections at the moment. And the news sources know most people are going to think it is something unusual.

How long would it take to analyze and collect data of an engineered virus if all tests had to be done ethically and in a controlled environment? I would assume a long time. The logistics and paper work to get volunteers to willingly subject themselves to a virus, and the amount of people you will need to establish the characteristics of said virus would bare astronomical costs, not to mention the moral ethics of said experiment.

The time frame is also significant. Now why not release said virus into the world? The benefits are you have 1000s of doctors doing the research on your behalf for free, and with such a large testing group, all variables come into effect. Its the greatest science experiment of our time.

If the goal is population control you obviously want to target the older generations and sickly people to thin out the herd. After you receive your results from months of feedback from all across the world you make the required changes to have a little more aggressive virus, fine tuned to thin the herd drastically.
Multiple problems with this. The virus kills the wrong people if population reduction is the aim. Even if it killed more younger people it would still be an unreliable, blunt instrument. Then there is the issue with trying to collect data from what is essentially a totally uncontrolled experiment with a long list of variables. Assuming you can collect useful data you have to know exactly how to change the virus to make it do what you want. Can you make it more infectious, more deadly and change the vulnerable group at the same?

Taking into consideration that we are overpopulated and already reached a point where machines and software can do so much, now would be the best time to thin out the world population. Majority of labor can already be replaced with software and hardware. Why even care about the millions of deaths if its for the greater good? Do you know those families being torn apart?
How would you tailor a virus to kill only unskilled people under a certain age?
 
Top