Today I received a phonecall from someone at Sentech stating that I’ve exceeded 10GB of traffic in September; that this was now defined as abusive according to the contract; and could I please tone it down a bit? I, of course, denied that I was doing anything abusive. Further, I’ve just this morning submitted a request for refund for September – since I’ve been unable to exceed 4kB/s for the whole of September – and usually much less than that. So, how 10GB could be reached under such circumstances boggles the mind.
When I signed up in April it was for a 128Kb, uncapped, always-on service. How can they now legally change the contract to a 10GB cap?! I (naively) assumed that 75% of capacity was reasonable. How can less than 25% of capacity, by any stretch of the imagination, be considered reasonable? I didn’t sign up for a 32Kb link!
If the current throughput prevails, the traffic I generate is likely to increase. I told the caller as much. It seems that they know they have no legal leg to stand on, since I was assured that the 10GB cap was not a cap, but merely a guideline, and that further (unspecified) steps would have to be taken if I continue to exceed the limit.
What is this supposed to achieve? Is this some half-hearted scare-tactic to try and intimidate users into using less bandwidth? How many have fallen for this?
‘P’d-off (even more)
When I signed up in April it was for a 128Kb, uncapped, always-on service. How can they now legally change the contract to a 10GB cap?! I (naively) assumed that 75% of capacity was reasonable. How can less than 25% of capacity, by any stretch of the imagination, be considered reasonable? I didn’t sign up for a 32Kb link!
If the current throughput prevails, the traffic I generate is likely to increase. I told the caller as much. It seems that they know they have no legal leg to stand on, since I was assured that the 10GB cap was not a cap, but merely a guideline, and that further (unspecified) steps would have to be taken if I continue to exceed the limit.
What is this supposed to achieve? Is this some half-hearted scare-tactic to try and intimidate users into using less bandwidth? How many have fallen for this?
‘P’d-off (even more)