We took murali for nearly 6 an over. So really it was only the one spinner we couldn't get away and he also bagged the key wickets which is why we lost. If the pitch was dreadfull slow then we wouldn't be scoring at nearly 6 an over vs murali.
Regardless smith should make his decisions based on the pitch and not what he always does, that is my point here.
I understand we failed in every thing possible including the choice to bat or bowl but smither needs to make his decision based on looking at pitch not thinking ok supersport park we bat second if we win the toss and i don't care if the pitch will be better for batting first up. Surely there is a reason they inspect the pitch or is that just a formality in world cricket?