- Jun 23, 2008
Would probably be cheaper as well.They are mistaken in taking the view that they are re-usable assets that can be "handed down". They should rather have planned to give high school students their own tablet permanently (due to the rate of obsolescence and their finite life), and it could be an aid to them in their job hunt after leaving school. If they seriously regarded tablets for students as once off purchases of permanent assets that they could perpetually re-use they made a serious planning mistake.
They could have just given every student one of these. Students would also be more inclined to look after it.