Scary_Turtle
Expert Member
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2015
- Messages
- 3,205
lots of forwards and only 1.5 backs. Risky.
I see what you did there
lots of forwards and only 1.5 backs. Risky.
That is why it is called a bomb squad. It can blow up in your face or count in your favour.lots of forwards and only 1.5 backs. Risky.
According to Eskom, there will be no load shedding over the weekend, so you can watch the game.That's just great, load shedding in my area at the time of the Boks game......
According to Eskom, there will be no load shedding over the weekend, so you can watch the game.
According to Eskom, there will be no load shedding over the weekend, so you can watch the game.
Ah excellent news! Thanks.
Come on man, really? Really? Can't just let us have the moment?

Remember Italy v England a couple of years back?
I think Japan might try that against the Boks, not committing to the rucks and allowing them to stray "offside" with impunity, screwing up Faf's chance to pass to an oncoming barging forward.
Won't be able to box kick as he'd be charged down all day. Screwing up our entire structure and in so doing our defense, allowing them to run rampant.
View attachment 725754
View attachment 725756
View attachment 725758
It is illegal now.
Even if it wasn't illegal and done a bit smarter... I've seen PSDT and a number of others taking the tackle, gone to ground, regathered and drove on.
I think it would be quite a dishonour to Japan and it's people to employ dirty tactics like that, at its own world cup. I don't see them fouling the game in that sense, illegal or not.
World Rugby has tidied up the 'tackle-only' law that caused England so much trouble against Italy
WORLD RUGBY HAS today announced six Law amendments that will be added to their global trials, including Law 16, which came under so much scrutiny during this year’s Six Nations.
...
The new Law 16 (ruck) now reads:
“A ruck commences when at least one player is on their feet and over the ball which is on the ground (tackled player, tackler). At this point the offside lines are created. Players on their feet may use their hands to pick up the ball as long as this is immediate. As soon as an opposition player arrives, no hands can be used.”
World Rugby says all amendments have been made in an effort to make the game easier for players and officials. A second amendment has been made with this in mind around the tackle area. The existing Law 15.4 (c) reads:
From 1 August however, players looking to jackal must do so from their ‘gate’ as the new Law reads:The tackler must get up before playing the ball and then may play the ball from any direction.
In addition, Law 16.4 now includes kicking the ball out of a ruck as an offence. The practice has been shown to be dangerous given players’ heads are never far away.The tackler must get up before playing the ball and then can only play from their own side of the tackle “gate”.
The remaining three amendments to the Laws relate to the scrum. Law 20.8 (b) now requires a strike attempt by the team who had the put-in, with a free-kick to be awarded if they fail to attempt to hook the ball back.
Law 20.9 (b) will see number eights permitted to pick the ball from the feet of their second rows, while Law 20.5 and 20.6 (d) relate to how a scrum-half puts the ball into the set-piece, the number nine will no longer need a referee’s signal to put in and will be allowed stand with a shoulder in line with the middle of the scrum before sending the ball in straight.
Yes, thanks. What I mean is them employing or exploiting a loophole. I don't seem them doing it at their world cup. They'll play a clean game. Might challenge us tactically though, also why change what's working?![]()
World Rugby has tidied up the 'tackle-only' law that caused England so much trouble against Italy
In addition, players will no longer be able to kick the ball out of rucks and jackaling players must work from their own gate.www.the42.ie
All of these named exploits have been patched. It is now more about consistent refereeing than teams writing their own laws of the game.
Yes, thanks. What I mean is them employing or exploiting a loophole. I don't seem them doing it at their world cup. They'll play a clean game. Might challenge us tactically though, also why change what's working?
"We know South Africa focus on the forwards with their maul and scrum. We need to stop that. And when we do stop it, they have no other option. So we will stop it."
Joseph, meanwhile, finished his segment of Friday's press conference with a little teaser.
"We have been preparing all week for (South Africa's physical approach). What is not so clear is what we are going to do and that's what I am looking forward to."