A few comments...
There's a danger that the focus on high tackles is going to spoil the semi's or finals.
Where there's an obvious arm around the throat a yellow is fine, but when an arm 'slips'across the neck because the tackler is moving downwards a penalty should be sufficient.
Have you seen some of these necks, you could whack them with a lamppost and the lamppost would come off second best. What happens to necks in a collapsed scrum is far more dangerous yet ...
Faf - does he not know anything else but box kick ? I thought it was perhaps the game plan for some reason but when he was replaced by Jantjies he didn't box kick once.
Finally - what are the odds on England beating the All Blacks and if we do beat Wales which would we rather play ?
Technically England looks to be the best side IMHO. The All Blacks are the most enterprising and adaptive side which makes them extremely dangerous, especially having playmakers in close to every combination.
Many say the Springboks scored more tries in the pool phases, but New Zealand and England skipped on their last pool round.
The Springboks I believe Rassie took what the Springboks does culturally and traditionally the best and tuned it to be RWC ready. My problem with the Springboks is that the backline seems a bit individual in play. We go through the phases, but it lacks cohesion in the backline. It is okay when the winger gets the ball because that is the player you put through to the goal line, but the best cohesion in this RWC happened when we had a 'loose' player backing and or supporting the wingers.
Kolisi, du Toit, Snyman, all had phenomenal backline plays in this competition. As always, I believe our issue is with the centre pairings, but not the centres per se.
When people criticise the box kicks, they should have Rassie take the blame because that is our gameplan he and this consultants and assistants designed and implemented. Players execute.
England will easier break our brutality down than the Kiwis, but the Kiwis will starve us.