For all the moaners about Faf's kicking:
1) It was Rassie's game plan. Blame/credit him, not Faf.
2) This explains why:
View attachment 726370
Ja, no. That's cherry picking the stats to fit a certain narrative.
The England vs Aus game is probably the worst example (best if you just want to cherrypick) and Australia was particularly poor. Nobody is saying running the ball out of your own 22 is a good idea.
I think it is half right. The team that wins the kicking game does win more often in the end. But who wants to win 80% of their world cup games? There's however more to kicking than just box kicks and up and unders.
I don't think any changes in the laws is necessary.
Japan beat Ireland and Scotland with a running game, they changed to a more kicking game against us.
Australia beat the allblacks that one game in when they got their running game correct.
NZ kicks a lot. But you don't even realise when watching them, if you watch them it feels like great running rugby.
I remember many good tries during the world cup that was scored from running almost 50m.
I get that it's our game plan, but Reinach and Herchel gets a better balance. Faf does over do it a bit. There's examples where we just win one of the kicks, there's space out wide but then faf does another box kick.
I would like to see someone actually do a proper analysis, but it seems like squidge has gone quiet. And I'm not sure of any other commentators that gets that deep into the details.