Smurfatefrog : I know we've had this argument before.... and we're entitled to each others opinions but 1024x768 is a 4:3 aspect ratio resolution, that is an undeniable fact.
1024 / 768 = 1.333333333333 ---- 4 / 3 = 1.333333333333
1280 / 720 = 1.777777777778 ---- 16 / 9 = 1.777777777778
If the pixels aren't "square" then its doing massive image manipulation to get a 16:9 image displayed even vaguely correctly.
plasma has always dominated the big screens
lcd's is only now slowly catching up to plasma screens.
plasma you get a better picture quality and value for money
:erm::erm::erm:
this is not true, absolutely NOTHING beats playing a blu ray or full HD media on a full HD lcd, its perfect!!!! The plasma's arent as bright, the LCD's have surpassed the plasmas and LCD/LED is becoming the standard. Saying that though, plasmas have become excellent value for money and when I bought my plasma, I could buy a bigger plasma for the same price as a smaller lcd. I preferred going for the size. In short, if you are looking for a great FULL HD panel at a steal, plasma is perfect. I've had mine for almost 5 years and its still good as new.
Dude
SA is way behind the world when it comes to technology. Blu Ray HD equipment is still new here and too expensive for the average Joe.by next year blu ray and hd goodies will become gradually cheaper, but it would be a waste in buying full hd now.
Its almost like buying a Lamborgini and driving on our 120km freeways
Ek is ook nie MAn van Staal wat elke pixel kan raak sien nie.
lol. here are tests done by professionals. Media myths that LCD is better. Top qualitys plasma like Pioneers, Panasonics and even Samsungs now are superior to LCD. Look at the stats if you dont believe me. LED is not OLED. LED is just the LED backlit versions of LCD and still dont match up to top quality Plasma's IMO
http://technabob.com/blog/2009/07/14/plasma-vs-lcd-tv-test/
http://www.displaymate.com/LCD_Plasma_ShootOut.htm
For the average Joe, this screen is adequate w.r.t. specs,picture quality, inputs,etc.
I love how most people think 1080p is the most important spec on a TV
You have to be closer than 2.5 meters to spot the difference between a Pioneer PDP-508XG (1366x768) and the LX (1080p) model. These are 50 inchers. This is on a side by side comparison and with a paused picture ... the moment you let the Blu-Ray play it becomes almost impossible to see any difference. Put these TV's in separate rooms and view from 3 meters and you will not be able to tell which is which. The HD-ready 508 also takes a 1080p signal (very few 768p sets do), so this side by side comparison is possible feeding both panels the same signal.
Almost every other spec on a TV makes a very noticeable difference. Black level, STATIC contrast ratio, colour correctness, image processing. One million perfectly rendered pixels will give you a much better experience than 2 million badly rendered pixels. Why do you think there is such a huge price difference between a Sony S-series and the W-series, they use the same panels.
If you play xbox/ps3 90% of the time, get an LCD. If you watch TV in a very brightly lit area then LCD is a good option. They have improved viewing angles on LCD's significantly, but even the best Sony XBR8, XBR9 with local dimming backlit LED still gives you a very noticeable colour shift for any off axis viewing (that for me is a deal breaker). If you have a light controlled room or watch SD content a lot, then plasma is definitely your best option.