Johnatan56
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2013
- Messages
- 30,961
Where did you get that figure? It's definitely wrong.It’s 50 - 60 years if you not in the mood to calculate yourself.
Why the mark-up?How much investment needed for wind and solar farms to power JHB? What the ROI on that if we cap the utility bill with a 50% mark up of current prices?
You won't build nuclear within 4 years, I linked you the median time to build nuclear. That's besides you ignoring everything else, the cost and repercussions.Nuclear is still the best option for the next 5 years, if we don’t have nuclear of the ground by 2025/6, we stuffed.
No, you'll see the exact opposite as people will head to cities for jobs. That's what happens for everyone developed economy.The current pandemic though can be used to drive out populations from the cities. Thus evening out the grid dependency and possibly privatizing renewable energy on towns outside urban areas.
Why only wind? That's only part of the equation, a balance is what is needed, the same as one shouldn't only have coal, or only nuclear.How’s parts of Europe doing with their wind farms btw?
In general, good:
All electricity in Austria's largest state now produced from renewables
Hydroelectric power, wind energy, biomass and solar provide 100% of electricity for 1.65 million people
Well South Africa would probably use a mix of lots of different companies, and there are usually requirements in regards to local manufacturing. If South Africa did coal, you'd probably find US/EU influence on it as well. That's a strawman argument.Maybe they just want to sell us all the latest in renewable technology so the loan US the money towards buying the tech, from them and then hope we pay them back
I'm done with this discussion, Ghost seems like an alt account of someone that got banned, and C4Cat, you just like crying capitalism is terrible, so no point in this.