Can somebody "decode" this for me please... I can see the popular one (unfortunatly!!!

) is Northcliff! But where are the others and how can I set it so that it doesn't use Northcliff anymore? (If possible!)
OVERRUN! do "show" ut02Kd1::: *
17492.480 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 2 Cost -66 Distance 16 Load 2
17502.730 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 2 Cost -66 Distance 16 Load 3
17512.980 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 2 Cost -65 Distance 16 Load 3
17523.225 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 2 Cost -66 Distance 16 Load 3
17533.475 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 2 Cost -66 Distance 16 Load 3
17543.725 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 2 Cost -66 Distance 16 Load 3
17553.975 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 2 Cost -66 Distance 16 Load 3
17564.220 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 2 Cost -66 Distance 16 Load 3
17574.470 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 2 Cost -73 Distance 16 Load 2
17584.720 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 2 Cost -78 Distance 16 Load 2
17594.970 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 2 Cost -84 Distance 16 Load 2
17594.970 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 46 Cost -116 Distance 32 Load 0
17594.970 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 27 Cost -117 Distance 9 Load 0
17605.215 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 2 Cost -84 Distance 16 Load 2
17605.215 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 47 Cost -118 Distance 10 Load 0
17615.465 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 2 Cost -86 Distance 16 Load 2
17615.465 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 13 Cost -109 Distance 27 Load 2
17625.715 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 2 Cost -84 Distance 16 Load 2
17635.965 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 2 Cost -84 Distance 16 Load 2
17646.210 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 2 Cost -86 Distance 16 Load 2
17646.210 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 13 Cost -107 Distance 27 Load 2
17656.460 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 2 Cost -84 Distance 16 Load 2
17666.710 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 2 Cost -84 Distance 16 Load 2
17676.960 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 2 Cost -85 Distance 16 Load 3
17687.205 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 2 Cost -85 Distance 16 Load 2
17687.205 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 47 Cost -118 Distance 37 Load 0
17697.455 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 2 Cost -83 Distance 16 Load 2
17738.300 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 2 Cost -85 Distance 16 Load 3
17738.300 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 47 Cost -118 Distance 10 Load 0
17748.500 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 2 Cost -81 Distance 16 Load 3
17758.750 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 2 Cost -70 Distance 16 Load 3
17768.1000 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 2 Cost -69 Distance 16 Load 3
17779.245 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 2 Cost -64 Distance 16 Load 3
17789.495 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 2 Cost -82 Distance 16 Load 3
17789.495 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 13 Cost -100 Distance 27 Load 2
17789.495 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 56 Cost -112 Distance 11 Load 0
17789.495 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 6 Cost -118 Distance 13 Load 0
17799.745 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 2 Cost -73 Distance 16 Load 3
17799.745 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 20 Cost -109 Distance 31 Load 1
17809.995 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 2 Cost -81 Distance 16 Load 3
17809.995 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 13 Cost -94 Distance 27 Load 2
17809.995 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 11 Cost -112 Distance 18 Load 0
17820.240 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 2 Cost -66 Distance 16 Load 3
17820.240 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 52 Cost -98 Distance 7 Load 0
17830.490 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 2 Cost -66 Distance 16 Load 3
17840.740 rfScanGpp 1 Bscc 2 Cost -65 Distance 16 Load 3
rfScan debug 0
With the signal strength (cost) thing, is a higher (-112) or lower (-66) number better?