Tokolotshe
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2005
- Messages
- 12,219
Lorena Bobbitt agrees.
Lorena Bobbitt agrees.
They can have whatever "feelings" they want. The issue comes in when they try to force me to accept those feelings over facts. Everyone should have the right to refuse.Yes but here is the problem - what right do you have to tell them that they can't have their feelings? Because it offends you? Trust me there are many out there who are offended by something about you, and if we start telling people they can't be because ...
So long as they aren't hurting anyone let them be, because it hurts every else more if we start restricting things people want to do / be / feel.
@OrbitalDawn @C4Cat
Seeing as you guys are experts on this stuff and told me that the compelled speech stuff was just the rantings of a lobster obsessed lunatic, what do you guys think of this.
How is it not compelled speech? This lunatic wants to force someone to accept a certain point of view of the world, then force them to act on it.Given it's not about compelled speech, but denial of service, the "lobster obsessed lunatic" is a red herring.
.
How is it not compelled speech? This lunatic wants to force someone to accept a certain point of view of the world, then force them to act on it.
Somewhere this absurdity must end.
Make automated tampon replacement mandated. No intelligence or questions asked, no ifs or buts. Should stop the perverts.Somewhere this absurdity must end.
How is it not compelled speech? This lunatic wants to force someone to accept a certain point of view of the world, then force them to act on it.
This isn't hard to understand. It's about providing a service, and what grounds are reasonable for denying service. Yaniv wanted the salon to provide a service, the salon declined, reasonably in my view.
Another ma'am?This is the bloke who got me banned from Twitter by mentioning his sex.
Jonathan Yaniv. Even uses a male name.
Have you seen him?
That means that the Salon owner rightfully has the ability to decide on someone elses's gender. Which is bigoted and racist according to your pals in the left.
That means that the Salon owner rightfully has the ability to decide on someone elses's gender. Which is bigoted and racist according to your pals in the left.
A princess, indeed
View attachment 688131
