Sinbad
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2006
- Messages
- 81,190
The nice thing with neutron bombs is they don't damage infrastructure at all.Needs to be relatively tactical in nature though... we don't want to cause TOO much collateral damage.
The nice thing with neutron bombs is they don't damage infrastructure at all.Needs to be relatively tactical in nature though... we don't want to cause TOO much collateral damage.
Even claymores won't do that much. If there is too many people, the shrapnel can't penetrate. You want overpressure to exceed around 26kpa. So of more airblast type weapon - fuel air bomb of similar.
The nice thing with neutron bombs is they don't damage infrastructure at all.
Very true, but we still want a contained "blast radius" though...
This is banned by the Geneva conventionHaribo Sugar Free Gummy Bears... and lock the gates.
Thermobaric type explosives are a good fit.
This is banned by the Geneva convention
I prefer Sinbad's suggestion. It would leave the infrastructure undamaged...
Well its not a properly enclosed space...and it wont necessarily kill everyone. Thermobaric bombs are considered inhuman. Perhaps a neutron explosive is best. I'd still use the Thermo.
There are humane bombs ?
It's one thing to threaten to pk someone and another to threaten to maim/kill.
It's one thing to threaten to pk someone and another to threaten to maim/kill.
Lets see if the trash SAHRC picks this up.
A thermobaric-type explosive might be ideal.
A thermobaric weapon, aerosol bomb, or vacuum bomb,[1] is a type of explosive that uses oxygen from the surrounding air to generate a high-temperature explosion, and in practice the blast wave typically produced by such a weapon is of a significantly longer duration than that produced by a conventional condensed explosive. The fuel-air explosive (FAE) is one of the best-known types of thermobaric weapons.
Well if we're going that way, a neutron bomb would be ideal.