Afriforum seeks interdict to prevent Eskom from cutting off 20 towns

Joined
Mar 6, 2004
Messages
41,689
I'm with Eskom on this one...

Civil rights movement AfriForum will approach the court to prevent Eskom from cutting the power supply to 20 towns that are in arrears on their bulk electricity bills.

Eskom is threatening to restrict electricity supply to these towns, including places like Harrismith, Welkom, Grahamstown, Witbank and Secunda for several hours every morning and night starting June 5.

It has started with formal preparations, including informing affected parties about its intentions.

Eskom said in a statement last week that the 20 municipalities are a collective R3.68 billion in arrears. Total municipal arrears to Eskom amount to R4.6 billion.

AfriForum head of community structures Tiaan Esterhuizen told Moneyweb on Tuesday that the organisation has consulted with its lawyers and will approach the court for an interdict to prevent the supply restrictions.

It is not yet clear whether one [legal] action will be possible in relation to all the towns, or whether separate actions will be necessary. It will be based on the argument that Eskom is applying load shedding in a discriminatory fashion.

Esterhuizen says AfriForum will ask the court to order affected municipalities to enter into a payment plan with Eskom and to report back to court on progress in this regard within a specified time frame.

He says AfriForum has been successful with such applications before with regard to Thaba Chweu municipality (Lydenburg) and the City of Matlosana (Klerksdorp). A municipality that enters into such a plan under court supervision and fails to adhere to it, exposes itself to a charge of contempt of court, in which case “the municipal manager can be locked up”.

Both of these municipalities are however back on the list of defaulters.

Esterhuizen says it is difficult to understand why Eskom has not reverted to a contempt of court in these cases and AfriForum is currently looking into the possibility of doing it itself.

Eskom spokesperson Khule Phasiwe could not be reached for comment.

Esterhuizen says the only long-term solution is for electricity revenue to be ring-fenced and used for paying the municipality’s Eskom bill before anything else and to allow private companies to obtain distribution licences.

In the meantime Nestlé South Africa has expressed its concern about the inclusion of the Maluti-A-Phofung municipality that supplies electricity to Harrismith, where its infant nutrition factory is located on the list of targeted municipalities.

“While we understand the position that Eskom finds itself in, we are obviously very concerned about the potential impact of this power outage. Our operations and consumers will be highly affected,” Motshidisi Mokwena, Spokesperson for Nestlé South Africa said.

“Since 2014, we have been in regular discussions with all key stakeholders at national, regional and local government level to resolve this matter as it has grave implications for business,” she said.

Nestlé’s Harrismith factory employs more than 400 people and was expanded in 2008 through a foreign direct investment of R345 million to increase production capacity. “This resulted in additional jobs being created for the local community. It is therefore not in anyone’s best interest to have power cuts as this will affect everyone: our company, employees, the province and the country at large but most importantly, our consumers,” Mokwena said.

She added that Nestlé continues to engage the municipality.

http://www.moneyweb.co.za/news/south-africa/power-cuts-to-20-towns-interdict-sought/
 

LazyLion

King of de Jungle
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
105,603
We all want people to pay their dues, but the fact is, it isn't the fault of the users in those towns (who have been dutifully paying their rates and taxes), it is the fault of the Munis who squandered the money on chicken and wine for numerous pointless conventions and training seminars. So why punish the people? The elected officials should have to pay out of their own pockets... and then a plan made to make up the rest.
 

daveza

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 5, 2004
Messages
47,670
I doubt it would be legal to cut the power for someone who has paid for it.
 

Viva

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2009
Messages
4,494
I doubt it would be legal to cut the power for someone who has paid for it.

Legal for who? The municipality is not cutting their client's power. Eskom is cutting their non-paying client's power, which is the municipality. This is the only way to force the municipality to get their act together and pay up. Because now the whole town should be on their case. This is not a battle to be fought against Eskom, but the municipality.
 

Zewp

Banned
Joined
Sep 3, 2009
Messages
10,655
As much as I'd like to see their power cut and see our power problems temporarily solved, think of the people falling under those municipalities who have been paying their rates and taxes all along. This will cripple businesses and they won't recover.
 

Fulcrum29

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
55,031
People will sing another tune when their own 'paid' power is about to be cut, and Nestlé is correct.

“While we understand the position that Eskom finds itself in, we are obviously very concerned about the potential impact of this power outage. Our operations and consumers will be highly affected,” Motshidisi Mokwena, Spokesperson for Nestlé South Africa said.

“Since 2014, we have been in regular discussions with all key stakeholders at national, regional and local government level to resolve this matter as it has grave implications for business,” she said.

When you cut a good standing business's power, then you remove the bread and butter.
 

Grant

Honorary Master
Joined
Mar 27, 2007
Messages
60,604
We all want people to pay their dues, but the fact is, it isn't the fault of the users in those towns (who have been dutifully paying their rates and taxes), it is the fault of the Munis who squandered the money on chicken and wine for numerous pointless conventions and training seminars. So why punish the people? The elected officials should have to pay out of their own pockets... and then a plan made to make up the rest.

this is so true
many who have paid are under threat for no reason of their own.

power supply & salaries for municipality management should be terminated
 

daveza

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 5, 2004
Messages
47,670
I presume this debt is very old so actually Eskom has allowed it to become a problem through being too incompetent to collect their own book.
 
F

Fudzy

Guest
Why doesn't Eskom garnish a certain amount of each unit sold to recover the funds or would this take too long?
 

Jings

Treasure Maker
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
39,676
Eskom needs to come up with an innovative way to collect the arrears. Restricting power to affected communities will damage the economy in those areas. Hopefully residents are taking note of their municipality's mismanagement in view of future local elections.
 

clusterpower

New Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Messages
8
Eskom refuse to bow their head and take the blame,it always looks for cracks to hide away for its own doing the same can be said about the government
 

Viva

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2009
Messages
4,494
As much as I'd like to see their power cut and see our power problems temporarily solved, think of the people falling under those municipalities who have been paying their rates and taxes all along. This will cripple businesses and they won't recover.

You're right, it will be devastating to those businesses.

That said, don't forget that those people voted in the local government elections. In the long term, it makes no sense to keep the power on for municipalities who don't pay their bills. Given that these officials have no moral compass, why would they pay Eskom if they can get away without paying. Cutting the power creates a powerful incentive, which is dependant on the wrath of the business owners who are closing shop.
 

Sinbad

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 5, 2006
Messages
81,150
Eskom refuse to bow their head and take the blame,it always looks for cracks to hide away for its own doing the same can be said about the government

Government is to blame, not eskom. Government own eskom. They disallowed expansion in 1998 and insisted on the zero maintenance keep the lights on approach after 2008.
 
Top