AfriForum Youth lays criminal charges against UCT professor for over child porn distribution claim

[konfab]

Again - what if that is what is causing the problem. Pedophilia predates the internet.
The taboo causes victims to hide the abuse, its never a good thing.
Also, a "pedo" then seeking help has to deal with the urges might not because taboo around this and may not get the help they need.

Its not the attraction that is a crime, its the act.
but now you are virtue signaling BTW.

Of course pedophillia predates the internet. The accessibility of child pornography has hastened the spread.

A pedophile doesn't need virtue signalling groomers to defend them in order to phone a psychologist.

 

[konfab]

I find it odd that if he did indeed have these proclivities, he would be stupid enough to post child porn to the world.

He argued for 100% inheritance tax, which puts him into the category of being stupid enough to incriminate himself for CP.

 

[Vrotappel]

Who said I hate them? Today is the first day I've ever heard of them. Haven't bothered to form a strong opinion yet, and doubt I will in the near future.

It seems you have a problem with their actions, saying they have too much time on their hands.

 

[3WA]

It seems you have a problem with their actions, saying they have too much time on their hands.

Yes, I think they're being dumbasses. That is different from hating them.

 

[Maurice Kitching]

Of course pedophillia predates the internet. The accessibility of child pornography has hastened the spread.

A pedophile doesn't need virtue signalling groomers to defend them in order to phone a psychologist.

You beat me to it, but yes, a lot of groomers in these here parts.

 

[BeerIsNotGood...]

Sure. I'm just saying the pedophile explanation is nowhere near as likely as an account compromise. Anyone who's added a less-than-bright friend on Facebook has inevitably seen porn when their account got compromised. It happens all the time.

Afriforum youth clearly have too much time on their hands. This is what happens when the youth choose Jesus over sex and drugs.

For someone who doesn't "know them"

You clearly have strong opinion of them

 

[Gyre]

You beat me to it, but yes, a lot of groomers in these here parts.

That a confession?

 

[Neptuner]

That a confession?

The shoe just fits perfectly doesn't it? ... LOL

 

[3WA]

For someone who doesn't "know them"

You clearly have strong opinion of them

It's actually not a strong opinion at all. I've seen one story about them, in which they're doing something dumb, so I think they’re dumbasses. This is not rocket science here.

If it's important to you that I assess them more fairly, gimme a list of their achievements over the last twelve months, and if they've taken up any causes more notable than policing compromised Twitter accounts, I will think better of them.

 

[Nerfherder]

Yes, I think they're being dumbasses. That is different from hating them.

I'm pretty sure this is the case.

They are setting them selves up though because the next mistake they make and the people who dislike Afriforum will pounce.

If you are loud mouth enough to say that you can't be hacked... that becomes an open invitation.

 

[rh1]

I never thought I see a day when people argue in support of pedo's, but here we are.

 

[Nerfherder]

He argued for 100% inheritance tax, which puts him into the category of being stupid enough to incriminate himself for CP.

Well that just shows you are delusional... is a commie so must also molest kids.

 

[Moosedrool]

Can anyone make the case why a pedophile with a high public profile share his illegal saved pictures on social media?

This sounds like textbook defamation to me.

 

[Gyre]

I never thought I see a day when people argue in support of pedo's, but here we are.

Who is supporting?

 

[Nerfherder]

Of course pedophillia predates the internet. The accessibility of child pornography has hastened the spread.

Its just means its more available. Being visible and being more are two different things.

A pedophile doesn't need virtue signalling groomers to defend them in order to phone a psychologist.

The fact that you don't like talking about these things indicates you probably have something to hide.

Point the finger before it comes back at you etc...

Bakc on topic... De Vos has many enemies. Perhaps he does like little boys but this is evidence that people want to defame him not that he randomly shares his loot on private twitter accounts.

EDIT: Spelling

 

[Neptuner]

Its just means its more available. Being visible and being more are two different things.

The fact that you don't like talking about these things indicates you probably have something to hide.

Point the finger before it comes back at you etc...

Bakc on topic... De Vos has many enemies. Perhaps he dies like little boys but this is evidence that people want to defame him not that he randomly shares his loot on private twitter accounts.

Pierre de Vos has enemies name them and inform us how they harmed him?

 

[zolly]

All of these are possible in combination or alone:

1) Pierre is a closet pedo and accidentally shared some CP via one of his Twitter accounts
2) Pierre has made some enemies who are looking for revenge and hacked his account
3) Pierre has some really weak account security (he's about my parents age and I nearly died when I saw my parents passwords and how they were storing them)

 

[zolly]

Pierre de Vos has enemies name them

Anyone who he has called out in his Daily Maverick articles. Some of them include high profile people like Dali Mpofu.

inform us how they harmed him

Have you not seen what this entire thread is about?

 

[Neptuner]

All of these are possible in combination or alone:

1) Pierre is a closet pedo and accidentally shared some CP via one of his Twitter accounts

This sounds plausible, we'll see.

2) Pierre has made some enemies who are looking for revenge and hacked his account

Share his enemies, name them and show how they harmed him? the only comments he made recently whereby he stepped on the presidents toes was related the the public protector, below. Hardly qualifies.

"It would mean the president shouldn't be allowed to interfere with an independent body by suspending someone to protect himself from investigation."

Pierre de Vos, Constitutional law Professor - University of Cape Town

3) Pierre has some really weak account security (he's about my parents age and I nearly died when I saw my parents passwords and how they were storing them)

I doubt this, his tweet at 11:11 on the 2018/04/21 demonstrates how he mocks someone else for not using the correct twitter settings for login verification.

 

[Neptuner]

Anyone who he has called out in his Daily Maverick articles. Some of them include high profile people like Dali Mpofu.

Dali Mpofu? the Dali Mpofu? ok

Have you not seen what this entire thread is about?

Okay, so your basis is that which is in question? ok I see, interesting...