Al-Baghdadi detonated suicide vest, official says

Alan

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 30, 2005
Messages
62,475
Imagine hating Trump so much that you show respect to the head of ISIS.

Well they once fawned over Kim Jong Un’s sister for apparently sticking it to Pence.

I’ll say this for Kim Jong Un’s sister, Kim Yo Jong — she’s considerably better looking than the goon who runs North Korea. This may be faint praise, but there’s nothing faint about the praise being heaped on the dictator’s sister by America’s mainstream media.


According to CNN, to take perhaps the worst example, “if ‘diplomatic dance’ were an event at the Winter Olympics, Kim Jong Un’s younger sister would be favored to win gold.” CNN gushes that “with a smile, a handshake and a warm message in South Korea’s presidential guest book, Kim Yo Jong has struck a chord with the public just one day into the PyeongChang Games.”


CNN goes on to call Kim Jong Un’s sister “North Korea’s Ivanka Trump,” a label also used by the Washington Post in its frivolous, fawning story. CNN then quotes some professor’s view that Kim Yo Jong’s presence at the Olympics “is a signal that North Korea is not this crazy, weird former Cold War state — but it too has young women that are capable and are the future leadershi


11 times the media fawned over Kim Jong-un's sister, N.K. delegation at the Olympics
 

Alan

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 30, 2005
Messages
62,475
I know, ludicrous! Have you seen the Bromance between that guy Donald Trump and Kim Jong? Sycophantic stuff!

Trust Trump to turn liberals against appeasement. Hell he got them to embrace the CIA so why not.

Trump schmoozes up to Kim Jong-un in an effort to get him to give up his nuclear weapons programs. Liberals schmooze up to his sister simply because they hate Pence. Totally the same thing.
 
Last edited:

ponder

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 22, 2005
Messages
92,881
Finally. Although I thought they got him years ago? Or is this not the original leader

qFGFA9E.jpg
 

Jabulani22

Executive Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
5,277
What a load of uninformed drivel...as usual.

Maybe go read up on WW1 and WW2...
WW1 they entered after merchant ships were sunk , merchant ship presumably carrying aid to a country involved in the war , therefor i can say that they had already chosen to beinvolved in the war but not publicly.
WW2 , there has been some pretty convincing evidence that the US knew about pearl harbour before it happened and thats without the behind the scenes bargaining which went on between 3 or more parties .

Thank you , come again , Quinn
 

buka001

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
17,047
Trust Trump to turn liberals against appeasement. Hell he got them to embrace the CIA so why not.

Trump schmoozes up to Kim Jong-un in an effort to get him to give up his nuclear weapons programs. Liberals schmooze up to his sister simply because they hate Pence. Totally the same thing.
And yet missile testing and proliferation continues ...

Trump is the one being duped, quite simply, by playing to his ego.
 

TheMightyQuinn

Not amused...
Joined
Oct 6, 2010
Messages
32,065
WW1 they entered after merchant ships were sunk , merchant ship presumably carrying aid to a country involved in the war , therefor i can say that they had already chosen to beinvolved in the war but not publicly.

"presumably"...."therefor I can say.." These are your counter arguments against basic facts?

WW2 , there has been some pretty convincing evidence that the US knew about pearl harbour before it happened and thats without the behind the scenes bargaining which went on between 3 or more parties .

Thank you , come again , Quinn
Here you go...especially for the Pearl Harbor BS...

731631
 

Jabulani22

Executive Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
5,277
"presumably"...."therefor I can say.." These are your counter arguments against basic facts?


Here you go...especially for the Pearl Harbor BS...

View attachment 731631
1st of all , the WW1 part is front page of google .
2nd , it is debated in mainstream history that the sitting US president ignored warnings , so yeah keep the tinfoil and go make some popcorn for you while you read a bit.
 

TheMightyQuinn

Not amused...
Joined
Oct 6, 2010
Messages
32,065
1st of all , the WW1 part is front page of google .
2nd , it is debated in mainstream history that the sitting US president ignored warnings , so yeah keep the tinfoil and go make some popcorn for you while you read a bit.
More nonsense....as usual.
 

MidnightWizard

Executive Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2007
Messages
5,720
In perhaps the most interesting reaction of an enemy of Washington moments after the news broke Sunday, Iranian Minister of Information and Communications Technology Mohammad-Javad Azari Jahromi declared that Baghdadi's elimination was not “a big deal” and that Washington had simply destroyed its own “creature.”

US Merely Killed It's "Own Creature":

After the CIA and Pentagon flooded the Syrian battlefield with advanced weaponry during the early years of the war, such as the BGM-71 TOW anti-tank missile, more and more of these very weapons were documented ending up in the hands of ISIS, which they used against Syrian government forces

Meanwhile, in a separate statement Iranian government spokesman Ali Rabiei asserted that Baghdadi’s death would not ultimately put a stop to the Islamic State, and that US policies fueled the rise of the terror caliphate.

"As the death of Osama bin Laden didn’t eradicate terrorism, the death of al-Baghdadi will not put an end to Daeshism," Rabiei said. Explaining that the region's jihadist terror groups thrive “through American policies and regional petrodollars,” he said it's these “terror-nurturing swamps that need to be drained.”


THIS I agree with ..........

Dead men -- EVEN IF they are your OWN men -- TELL NO TALES !
 

MidnightWizard

Executive Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2007
Messages
5,720
More nonsense....as usual.
Please read up on ....

The ZIMMERMAN Telegram

The sinking of the LUSITANIA

The US has ALWAYS played a double game -- "allowed" itself to be "encouraged" into War
and
REAPED THE PROFITS

FDR ran his campaign on the promise that Americans would NEVER be involved in a war again.
Of course this was all rubbish and he quickly went back on his promise -- managing to run for a THIRD Term !
GREAT friend of STALIN !
 

Spliffcat

Executive Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2013
Messages
5,951
Where would I rather live? USA or an Isis controlled country? And the brave key board warriors?
 
  • Like
Reactions: OCP

LD50

Expert Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2019
Messages
1,986
I read...Al-baghdadi donated suicide vest, official says
 

Grant

Honorary Master
Joined
Mar 27, 2007
Messages
60,676
1st of all , the WW1 part is front page of google .
2nd , it is debated in mainstream history that the sitting US president ignored warnings , so yeah keep the tinfoil and go make some popcorn for you while you read a bit.
tinfoil hat ???

you're the one continually projecting and seems to subscribe to hare-brained conspiracies.
 
Top