SAOL and DOTCO
I would like to know the legal position on this. The way I see it, dotco owes me bandwidth for the remainder of the month without me having to commit to any other obligation nor enter any new contracts.
One of two things happened here.
1. There is a deal struck between SAOL / Dotco and no doubt with somebody exchanging money in the process. Or;
2. SAOL is using the DOTCO conundrum as marketing and writting off the dotco unutilised bandwidth for this month as sunken origination costs.
Number 1 above implies either dotco or SAOL (depending on the terms of the contract between SAOL and Dotco if it exists) not honouring my legal contract which I have signed with Dotco, while 2 implies SAOL is absuing this forum for selfish marketing purposes which is not allowed.
So SAOL, either one of two things is happening, you are using the dotco scenario for marketing your product and to obtain new clients on your books which from my understanding is prohibited on these forums, or some sale agreement occured and neither of the two companies are willing to honour my contract for the month of November. Which of the two terms are in you breach of?
If SAOL is honouring my existing contract with AllYouCanEat, then I am entitled to bandwidth for the remaining of the month from SAOL. Nowhere in my contract does it state that I am forced to enter into any new contract to receive bandwidth that I have already paid for.
For the record, I do not have a 30GB account at R130, I have a more realistic account whereby I am paying considerably more per GB.
My personal opinion, SAOL and others, are just using dotco to get additional clients on board, which it totally legit, barring the fact that it should be considered advertising on this forums which is / should not be allowed.
Anybody know if the debit order run for DOTCO will still commence the end of the month? Watch me get seriously p___ if that does happen.
Adios
Skouperd