American Circumcision (Documentary)

Slootvreter said:
FGM yes, male circumcision, no.
Click to expand...

Really?


The foreskin, containing 20,000 nerve endings as opposed to the 8,000 in a clitoris, is a highly sensitive, functioning part of the male anatomy.Sep 2, 2017
15 Facts about the Foreskin and Circumcision | The Nurturing Root

https://thenurturingroot.com/facts-about-foreskin-circumcision/
Click to expand...




CONCLUSIONS: The glans of the circumcised penis is less sensitive to fine touch than the glans of the uncircumcised penis. The transitional region from the external to the internal prepuce is the most sensitive region of the uncircumcised penis andmore sensitive than the most sensitive region of the circumcised penis.
Fine-touch pressure thresholds in the adult penis. - NCBI

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17378847
Click to expand...
 
Ockie said:
Really?
Click to expand...

The FGM I'm talking about is the horrific practice of cutting off the clit, and sometimes the labia gets damaged as well. It's a thing in many countries.

And of course it's more sensitive, probably directly after the operation and for some time afterwards, but not permanently. And quite a few friends and colleagues have noted that they prefer their cocks cut, it seems cleaner, they say.
 
Slootvreter said:
The FGM I'm talking about is the horrific practice of cutting off the clit, and sometimes the labia gets damaged as well. It's a thing in many countries.
Click to expand...
What are you comparing here - dirty backalley clitoris cutting vs. sterile hospital male circumcision? Of course the clit circumcision is worse if that's the argument. Probably more accurate then to compare it to the kind of male circumcision that occurs in the bush with dirty blunt knives.
 
saor said:
What are you comparing here - dirty backalley clitoris cutting vs. sterile hospital male circumcision? Of course the clit circumcision is worse if that's the case.
Click to expand...
Well, like you, I'm saying FGM is not the same as male circumcision.
 
Slootvreter said:
they prefer their cocks cut, it seems cleaner, they say.
Click to expand...

:rolleyes:

Soap and water. All you need to keep your cock nice and clean.

And hey .... if you are a adult and want to chop you foreskin off, go for it. But you should be left to make that choice as a adult .... not have it done to you as a baby.
 
Ockie said:
:rolleyes:

Soap and water. All you need to keep your cock nice and clean.

And hey .... if you are a adult and want to chop you foreskin off, go for it. But you should be left to make that choice as a adult .... not have it done to you as a baby.
Click to expand...
LOL. I've got no plans on getting cut. I'm merely saying it's not the same as FGM :D
 
Slootvreter said:
LOL. I've got no plans on getting cut. I'm merely saying it's not the same as FGM :D
Click to expand...

Well, we will have to agree to disagree on that one. There is also various degrees of FGM. You have a version where just the hood of the clit is apparently removed for "cleanlines". That to me is just as wrong .... same with MGM.

Oh .... and I was not referring to you specifically. Was talking in general about men that has a elective circumcision. That is their choice and right to do so for whatever reason ..... well.....if they do it cause their GF's says they prefer a cut cock then I would say to them they are fcking pussy whipped and they should then tell their GF's to go get themselves DD tits because that is what you prefer. :mad:
 
You can't blame the rock if you keep beating your own head against it
 
More deaths reported in the Eastern Cape circumcision season. CONTRALESA contends that if this ritual is banned Africans will be left with "nothing". So basically kill and mutilate, at least Africans will be having something to call their own.

ini.PNG
 
Ockie said:
That is their choice and right to do so for whatever reason ..... well.....if they do it cause their GF's says they prefer a cut cock then I would say to them they are fcking pussy whipped and they should then tell their GF's to go get themselves DD tits because that is what you prefer. :mad:
Click to expand...

Can't argue there!
 
Slootvreter said:
Exactly my question. There are even brochures and pamphlets that says it's beneficial to your health, specifically with regards to AIDS.

If it's got something to do with juices stuck under your foreskin for longer than it would be on a cut prick, then immediately washing afterwards should be pretty much the same.
Click to expand...
No - its got to do with the available area of absorption. Its less when you have no foreskin.
 
Slootvreter said:
Clit =/= Foreskin

EDIT; But basically, yes.
Click to expand...
The clit is not always cut in female circumcision. The main thing is to cut the hood protecting the clit... so pretty much the same thing.

Its savage either way. Why would you cut something off when there is no reason to ?
 
Nerfherder said:
The clit is not always cut in female circumcision. The main thing is to cut the hood protecting the clit... so pretty much the same thing.

Its savage either way. Why would you cut something off when there is no reason to ?
Click to expand...
Well I was specifically referring to FGM, where they cut all the external genitalia, which is probably the first few results in Google as well.

I also see no need to cut skin, but yeah, if done in a theater, I don't see any savagery.
 
Slootvreter said:
It's interesting. I couldn't really understand the logic behind arguing that getting cut is the better option.
Click to expand...

If its causing an issue then there is a good reason to cut it off. It could be too tight or become infected for whatever reason.

Its a useful piece of skin that keeps the glans lubricated and protected. There is also reduced sensitivity when you cut it off, this was the main reason for starting the practice. They wanted to take the joy out of w@nking.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X