If any of you are so inclined, take a look at this graph of my international throughput rates from March when I first signed up with MyWi:
http://www.tcpiq.com/tcpIQ/LineSpee...UserPerMonthSpeed&CountryId=196&UserId=123038
As you can see, mean throughput has halved since then.
<b>Here's the kicker, though - I upgraded to the 256k package on 5 August, 2004!</b>
Not only was there demonstrably no improvement after the upgrade, the bandwidth continued to deteriorate.
To my mind, this transcends mere bad service and could qualify as fraud.
I am currently attempting to determine if Sentech falls within the ambit of the Public Protector as it is a state owned enterprise in which case I will lay a complaint with that body. Furthermore, I am researching the possible criminal implications of charging more for less and deliberately misleading the public.
As it seems clear that neither the ASA, nor meetings with the secretive CUG, nor any amount of negative public sentiment is going to stir Sentech into rectifying the problem, I believe the only recourse now is the criminal justice system.
I was about to just cancel my contract and forget about it, but then I realised that was just the easy way out and achieves nothing in the long term. It is time for a clear signal to go out to organisations like Sentech and a for a precedent to be set - you will pay the price for taking us for granted.
http://www.tcpiq.com/tcpIQ/LineSpee...UserPerMonthSpeed&CountryId=196&UserId=123038
As you can see, mean throughput has halved since then.
<b>Here's the kicker, though - I upgraded to the 256k package on 5 August, 2004!</b>
Not only was there demonstrably no improvement after the upgrade, the bandwidth continued to deteriorate.
To my mind, this transcends mere bad service and could qualify as fraud.
I am currently attempting to determine if Sentech falls within the ambit of the Public Protector as it is a state owned enterprise in which case I will lay a complaint with that body. Furthermore, I am researching the possible criminal implications of charging more for less and deliberately misleading the public.
As it seems clear that neither the ASA, nor meetings with the secretive CUG, nor any amount of negative public sentiment is going to stir Sentech into rectifying the problem, I believe the only recourse now is the criminal justice system.
I was about to just cancel my contract and forget about it, but then I realised that was just the easy way out and achieves nothing in the long term. It is time for a clear signal to go out to organisations like Sentech and a for a precedent to be set - you will pay the price for taking us for granted.