Sign up with Googlehttp://www.mg.co.za/articlePage.aspx?articleid=289527&area=/insight/insight__national/
Is there any part of this organisation that is actually good?
Is there any part of this organisation that is actually good?
-
Ask a question and get free supportUnlock new privileges and see hidden discussionsWin prizes and earn reputation
-
Question of the day ~ How often do you braai?
-
Afristay giveaway.Win a 2-night stay for two people at an establishment of your choice with R1,000 in spending money. Enter here.
ANC rotten to the core!
- Thread starter jontyB
- Start date
K
kingrob
Guest
Corruption = ANC and all it stands for.
'A better tomorrow' - for some....
'A better tomorrow' - for some....
IamCanadian
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2006
- Messages
- 632
http://www.mg.co.za/articlePage.aspx?articleid=289527&area=/insight/insight__national/
Is there any part of this organisation that is actually good?
The ice troll from frigid north says NO!
A New Corruption?
Am I wrong in sensing surprise at this realisation. I always new they were corrupt shysters. The ANC today is no different to the one 10 years ago.
I hate to say it
but I told you so
.Its disappointing to know for sure that 50% of this story is inaccurate. I cannot comment on the rest of Chancellor House's other business involvements but with respect to Manganese and Russia, the reporting is not accurate.
The writer has chosen to ignore the whole story about the Manganese Saga which includes and not limited to Samancor, Assmang and Assore.
50% of this story qualifies as a “Smear Campaign” because either I know better than the reporter or the reporter knows as much but has chosen to be selective at reporting it.
The writer has chosen to ignore the whole story about the Manganese Saga which includes and not limited to Samancor, Assmang and Assore.
50% of this story qualifies as a “Smear Campaign” because either I know better than the reporter or the reporter knows as much but has chosen to be selective at reporting it.
Last edited:
Am I wrong in sensing surprise at this realisation. I always new they were corrupt shysters. The ANC today is no different to the one 10 years ago.
I hate to say it
but I told you so
No surprise, just the realisation of what ANC stood for
Which is why reason dictates that citizens should change their governments from time to time. Parties with an absolute and long term hold on power go corrupt. It is how human nature works. Sadly in South Africa government does not seem to change hands very often.
I mean we have only had 2 governments in the last 50 years, and the party currently in power absorbed the party previously in power.
I mean we have only had 2 governments in the last 50 years, and the party currently in power absorbed the party previously in power.
IamCanadian
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2006
- Messages
- 632
South Africa has never had real democracy. It has failed.
The question is will SA ever become a true democracy like Canada or will it eventually resemble something like Zimbabwe.
1994 - Nice try though.
K
kingrob
Guest
Ok, have it your way - the ANC is only 50% corrupt.
Mmm, when my milk is 50% rotten I generally throw it away.
I think you're blowing smoke out of your Assore. I have the full research in front of me as well as all the companies and individuals involved in this thing, and it definitely all adds up. The company names mentioned are not even a tenth of the various fronting companies involved. Chancellor House is but one, there are several others and I have the proof right here in front of me. And the directors are the same time and time again, and goes as far as the World Cup Organising Committee.
jontyB: you're right, the ANC is rotten to the core.
Either that or you were only involved as far as was required?
For the record: Assmang is now called African Rainbow Minerals (ARM)