Polymathic
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2010
- Messages
- 33,431
- Reaction score
- 14,540
I think he's just trying to point out that you may have meant accusations?
Oh my bad [MENTION=97943]SauRoNZA[/MENTION]
I think he's just trying to point out that you may have meant accusations?
What about Apple?
I don't think Apple supplies iOS to any other companies, does it?
What about them?
They do not. Their OS's (macOS, tvOS, watchOs and iOS) only run on Apple hardware (Officially)
Their Google's biggest competitor in this space who also engages in anticompetitive behavior
You don't seem to understand what I'm talking aboutI really think you need to go and do some research into the differences between Android and iOS...
You don't seem to understand what I'm talking about
I think we all do, you're trying to use whatsboutism to make it an Android v Apple argument, when it isn't.
Apple is a closed proprietary system that is not used by any other company, what Google have been fined for with regard to how they've handled their open system in an anti-competitive manner is what's being discussed.
By what measure? Market cap?Nope Apple is the biggest tech company in the world
Nope Apple is the biggest tech company in the world who many experts say is also engaging in anticompetive behavior.
They have already done so looking at Fire OS found on Amazon tablets/Media players...I'm sure other companies would be happy to fork Android if allowed, especially as Google shouldn't be able to hold google apps to ransom after this judgement.
They have already done so looking at Fire OS found on Amazon tablets/Media players...
Not by default.Do you get all the google apps on fireOS devices?
Do you get all the google apps on fireOS devices?
Not by default.
Not sure since I haven't one used yet but the point is you can fork android.
I don't think there is any official method to install the Play Store iirc.
I've done it but it takes some serious effort.
GMS (Google Mobile Services) is completely separate and distinct from Android, and requires a separate licence. Android was bought by Google in 2005, and the company then developed the quite separate and distinct GMS, which it licensed to handset makers. Ordinary vanilla Android sans GMS is open source and licensed under the Non-Copyleft Apache and Copyleft GNU agreements, so anyone can use it, without using the name Android, which is separately copyrighted and licensed.
It's GMS that has the Google apps and Playstore.
I suspect the EU fine and directive relate only to GMS licences.
Commissioner Margrethe Vestager, in charge of competition policy, said: "Today, mobile internet makes up more than half of global internet traffic. It has changed the lives of millions of Europeans. Our case is about three types of restrictions that Google has imposed on Android device manufacturers and network operators to ensure that traffic on Android devices goes to the Google search engine. In this way, Google has used Android as a vehicle to cement the dominance of its search engine. These practices have denied rivals the chance to innovate and compete on the merits. They have denied European consumers the benefits of effective competition in the important mobile sphere.
This is illegal under EU antitrust rules."
In particular, Google:
has required manufacturers to pre-install the Google Search app and browser app (Chrome), as a condition for licensing Google's app store (the Play Store);
made payments to certain large manufacturers and mobile network operators on condition that they exclusively pre-installed the Google Search app on their devices; and
has prevented manufacturers wishing to pre-install Google apps from selling even a single smart mobile device running on alternative versions of Android that were not approved by Google (so-called "Android forks").