Angus Buchan apologises for saying only 'Jewish and Afrikaans people' have 'covenant with God'

[ToxicBunny]

So deserts don't grow every year and that means the amazon is not a desert?

You can try restate it however you want... in the context of this thread, its a stupid statement. You are attempting to use logic and failing spectacularly.

 

[rambo919]

You can try restate it however you want... in the context of this thread, its a stupid statement. You are attempting to use logic and failing spectacularly.

Nope you are spectacularly failing (on purpose) to understand logic. Just because it's true that the internet is full of stupid things does not mean any particular thing on it is stupid..... those are two independent facts that may or may not cross. The implication that something in particular was stupid was not properly substantiated by direct causation.

 

[ToxicBunny]

Nope you are spectacularly failing (on purpose) to understand logic. Just because it's true that the internet is full of stupid things does not mean any particular thing on it is stupid..... those are two independent facts that may or may not cross. The implication that something in particular was stupid was not properly substantiated by direct causation.

Ok dude, its ok.. Pretoria and Jerusalem are in the same time zone so therefore they're very much alike.....

 

[rambo919]

No,

According to Rambo, people in Bogata are similar to people in New York, because they share the same time zone.

Ok dude, its ok.. Pretoria and Jerusalem are in the same time zone so therefore they're very much alike.....

Except I never said that. I named a handful of corrolations that in combination seems to indicate something. The time zone of the two national and cultural capitals is just one correlation.

 

[ToxicBunny]

Except I never said that. I named a handful of corrolations that in combination seems to indicate something. The time zone of the two national and cultural capitals is just one correlation.

No, you listed a whole lot of irrelevant things, that indicate sweet FA.

 

[rambo919]

No, you listed a whole lot of irrelevant things, that indicate sweet FA.

And his irrelevant things are more factual than mine?

 

[ToxicBunny]

And his irrelevant things are more factual than mine?

Yeah.. very much so...

 

[rambo919]

Yeah.. very much so...

It's not that they indicate nothing it's that you are dead set against them indicating anything.

 

[surface]

Keeping this for posterity.

#logicfail

 

[ToxicBunny]

It's not that they indicate nothing it's that you are dead set against them indicating anything.

No, they indicate absolutely nothing... That is not really up for debate, unless you are hellbent on trying to find a way to make them indicate something.

 

[Bigjay84]

Everyone needs that special imaginary friend

 

[rambo919]

No, they indicate absolutely nothing... That is not really up for debate, unless you are hellbent on trying to find a way to make them indicate something.

You know.... I never actually tried to force you to believe it, it's ok to disagree without cramping.

You could always have countered with giving more examples of equal counter indications and showing they are more than the indications. Or you could have simply ignored me.

 

[ToxicBunny]

You know.... I never actually tried to force you to believe it, it's ok to disagree without cramping.

Did I claim that you tried to force me to believe it?

And I know its ok to disagree... but its also ok for me to call it complete bollocks, because it is.

 

[rambo919]

Did I claim that you tried to force me to believe it?

And I know its ok to disagree... but its also ok for me to call it complete bollocks, because it is.

Saying something is bollocks without giving proper reasoning for it is the same as baselessly saying anything is bollocks.... it does not actually mean anything in itself other than your opinion is it is bollocks. Your repetition of how bollocks it is as proof that it's bollocks..... I have given you enough of my energy.

 

[ToxicBunny]

Saying something is bollocks without giving proper reasoning for it is the same as baselessly saying anything is bollocks.... it does not actually mean anything in itself other than your opinion is it is bollocks. Your repetition of how bollocks it is as proof that it's bollocks..... I have given you enough of my energy.

Don't need reasoning. Pure bollocks is just that, pure bollocks.

 

[Nicodeamus]

K@kpraat bly k@kpraat

 

[grok]

Trust me, the pseudo-intellectual royal highnesses, otherwise known as atheists, can get just as annoying when sitting atop their high horses polishing their egos.....

Oh please, no way any atheistic royalty butt's gonna be touching no horse saddle.
What we'll do is get a Christian to sit on the horse, then we sit on them.
Double the ego points for Griffendor..

 

[surface]

Trust me, the pseudo-intellectual royal highnesses, otherwise known as atheists, can get just as annoying when sitting atop their high horses polishing their egos.....

I agree with you that atheists are human beings. It is a welcome relief to come from you man.

 

[My_King]

Trust me, the pseudo-intellectual royal highnesses, otherwise known as atheists, can get just as annoying when sitting atop their high horses polishing their egos.....

Can't recall I said anything, but to each their own I guess

 

[surface]

There's an inverse correlation between religion and intelligence.

If one gives any credence to evidence at all, this is possible (not sure if proven yet?) as far as the evidence of god is considered. Atheists and religious followers would be equally intelligent or dumb irrespective of their god positions. Human brain is quite capable of compartmentalization.

*NDT did mention a survey once about elite scientists and whether they believe personal god or not. I vaguely recall him saying something similar that you said here.