Another prison sex scandal as senior official is caught in the act with inmate in Durban

ForceFate

Honorary Master
Joined
May 18, 2009
Messages
32,202
People are prepared to forego their careers because of a shag with a prisoner?
 

skimread

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 18, 2010
Messages
10,870
If you are an ANC member than anything that makes you appear before court or have western rules apply, you are awarded the opposing colonial laws victim struggle credentials, that gives you a promotion and guarantees the ANC will take care of you. Doesn't matter how bad the crime. Heck Zuma became president by raping a woman and turning that into being victim.

Some other recent examples:


All rape cases against ANC guys get swept under the carpet.

Even low-level ANC like the guy who was charged with crucifying Brendin Horner in Senekal had his rape charges swept under the carpet. Only because of all the media outrage did they realize after he got bail that he was charged with raping 2 minors in 2001 but never went to court.

The odd chance they are forced to be accountable for rape by external organisations, they then just bus supporters, intimidate, and play delaying tactics.

Just look at the recent forensic backlog. This is 100% intentional so that they can't get DNA results and have to charge rapists. That's one way to cook GBV stats so voters don't turn against you.

The biggest blacklog at the FSL is in their biological division, with 111 342 cases yet to be attended


The family of five-year-old Chantelle Makwena, who was brutally raped and murdered, were told by the prosecutor that the reason the suspect had not been arrested was that there was no reagent at the labs to perform the DNA testing required to link him to the crime.

The suspect, who was out on bail for another rape case, has since disappeared.
 
Last edited:

TheChamp

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 26, 2011
Messages
41,747
If you are an ANC member than anything that makes you appear before court or have western rules apply, you are awarded the opposing colonial laws victim qualification that gives you a promotion. You get the title of comrade. Doesn't matter how bad the crime. Heck Zuma became president by raping a woman and turning that into being victim.

Some other recent examples:


All rape cases against ANC guys get swept under the carpet.

Even low-level ANC like the guy who was previously charged with crucifying Brendin Horner in Senekal are just left alone. Only because of all the media outrage did they realize he was charged with raping 2 minors in 2001 but never went to court.

The odd chance they are accountable they bus supporters, intimidate, and play delaying tactics.

Just look at the recent forensic backlog. This is 100% intentional so that they can't get DNA results and charge rapists.

I guess the fact that Zuma was found not guilty by a court of law doesn't matter to you? The next thing you'll be moaning about others who are assumed guilty even before they appear in court, one can't help but love this forum when it comes to hypocrisy.
 

skimread

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 18, 2010
Messages
10,870
I guess the fact that Zuma was found not guilty by a court of law doesn't matter to you? The next thing you'll be moaning about others who are assumed guilty even before they appear in court, one can't help but love this forum when it comes to hypocrisy.
Context matters. Zuma was found not guilty because the woman froze and didn't say No. She didn't give consent and Zuma said he didn't care as it was his duty as a Zulu to have sex with her, despite him knowing she had HIV. He didn't care if she was on her period or not. He didn't care he was married and didn't ask his wives permission. In many countries that testimony would mean rape. Look at David Ninow. Political parties were released by political organisations that said he raped the woman like all white men rape black women. But that is ironic as he was only found guilty and sentenced to life by a recent amended rape law of South Africa that don't exist in most countries that says you can be found guilty of rape by using something other than your penis. He used his finger. In most countries he would not be a rapist. if he did his act a few years ago he prior to the law change he couldn't be found guilty of rape.

My point is rape has been politicized in South Africa with the ANC. If you are ANC and rape, it gets swept under the carpet. (look at the numerous examples I gave in the post you respond to)

The idea of rape has so been obfuscated that the EFF can protests outside the US embassy and claim Americans rape.

She said: “We are disgusted by the actions of the racist police that are in the US, however we are not surprised by their behaviour. The US government has been a government of apartheid and they have led the onslaught of the black man throughout the whole African continent. They come here to steal our natural resources and rape us and kill us
If whites are rapists then why does the ANC increase the forensic backlog so dramatically to such absurd levels that rapists cannot get prosecuted anymore as simply there is no results and by the time the results are ready, too much time have passed. That is cooking rape statistics to such a level you cannot dispute it is evil.


Just look at that UCT professor who falsely lectures students that the reason South Africa was colonized was for Europeans to rape Africans.

Like it or not. Rape in South Africa has over the last couple of years had it meaning changed. It has undergone a semantic shift from an African perspective that will make Newton scratch his head.
 
Last edited:

TheChamp

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 26, 2011
Messages
41,747
Context matters. Zuma was found not guilty
That's where it's supposed to end, everything else is an unnecessary ramble, the merits of the case were argued in court and he was found not guilty.
 

skimread

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 18, 2010
Messages
10,870
That's where it's supposed to end, everything else is an unnecessary ramble, the merits of the case were argued in court and he was found not guilty.
Nope you can't quote and cut a sentence off like that. If your daughter slept over at your brother's house while his wife were in the house and he came into the room after she fell asleep and he forced himself on her while she slept in a single bedroom and she froze, would you defend him saying it's his Zulu duty. No sane father would say that the guy is not a rapist. No sane father would defend him.

No sane person would knowingly have sex with an HIV positive woman without protection.
No sane person in the middle of the night would go into a room of a person who is sleeping who sees you as an uncle and you are more than over 30 years older than her

Both you and Zuma are not sane.


You are the biggest hypocrite on the forum. I think everyone will agree to that. Your very admission that context doesn't matter proves it but you are too dumb to realize you just admitted it.

Tell me do you think rape with minors are consensual considering the age of consent was inherited by apartheid laws? Trying to understand from an ANC perspective and how these guys charged with rape are carried off like heros outside the courts once they get bail
 
Last edited:

Cosmik Debris

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 25, 2021
Messages
16,913
I guess the fact that Zuma was found not guilty by a court of law doesn't matter to you? The next thing you'll be moaning about others who are assumed guilty even before they appear in court, one can't help but love this forum when it comes to hypocrisy.

With the current incompetent state of the judiciary, are you surprised he was found not guilty?

The finding of not guilty does not mean he didn't commit rape. It means there is not enough evidence to prove rape. The term you're looking for is acquitted. He wasn't.
 

Cosmik Debris

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 25, 2021
Messages
16,913
But that is ironic as he was only found guilty and sentenced to life by a recent amended rape law of South Africa that don't exist in most countries that says you can be found guilty of rape by using something other than your penis. He used his finger. In most countries he would not be a rapist. if he did his act a few years ago he prior to the law change he couldn't be found guilty of rape.

Like it or not. Rape in South Africa has over the last couple of years had it meaning changed. It has undergone a semantic shift from an African perspective that will make Newton scratch his head.

Correct. I was invited to and attended a lecture by the SAHRC after the law was amended. Anyone putting their finger or any object in anyone else's mouth without their permission in South Africa can be charged with rape.
 
Top