Anti-gay pastor served for allegedly defying court ruling: ‘I will come out and preach the same message’

konfab

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 23, 2008
Messages
36,199
Fair is fair, just be consistent. If a religious preacher can advocate for criminalization and that gays be dealt with like in Nigeria, then surely we should be able to do the same for your church of closeted and cloistered pedophiles too?
Equality before the law & all that.
Of course they can advocate for it. Doesn't mean that people should listen to them.
 

Cray

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 11, 2010
Messages
34,604
"You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination."
"If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them."
Gotta love Leviticus...

 

daveza

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 5, 2004
Messages
47,681
"You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination."
"If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them."

So lesbians are okay then,
 

rambo919

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 30, 2008
Messages
23,178
Don't forget, religion always leads directly to terrorism, no one fights wars for any other reason, you have to be crazy or stupid to be religious, the flying spegetti monster is real, aliens created us millions of years ago, etc.
 

EADC

Executive Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2018
Messages
8,499
"You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination."
"If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them."

Yeah when they start living biblically for everything not just what they pick and choose then they can throw that around.
 
Last edited:

konfab

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 23, 2008
Messages
36,199
Yeah when they start living biblically for everything not just what they pick and choose then you can throwing that around.
It's almost as if there is a large body of theological work that has adapted the religion with the time. I mean wouldn't it just be so much better if the world's religions behaved like ISIS.

For example, protestantism basically dictates that people and churches are free to pick their own interpretations of the bible. And that is how they choose to live. It isn't any different from some leftist who gets all their moral guidance from late night comedians on cable TV.

And nevertheless, the creation of a secular state has rendered all these discussions moot about what the opinion is of book X.
 
Last edited:

rambo919

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 30, 2008
Messages
23,178
It's almost as if there is a large body of theological work that adapted the religion with the time. I mean wouldn't it just be so much better if the world's religions behaved like ISIS.
Yeah its almost as if someone somewhere saw that society was advancing beyond barbarian level and helped them back to the meaning of the original orders instead of just the literal meaning.....
 

EADC

Executive Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2018
Messages
8,499
It's almost as if there is a large body of theological work that adapted the religion with the time. I mean wouldn't it just be so much better if the world's religions behaved like ISIS.

That's the issue most religions have moved with the times but then a small subset will pick and choose what they want to be militant about.
 

daveza

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 5, 2004
Messages
47,681

Actually Paul mentions woman too for those looking for loopholes.


Once again it's all in the translation and interpretation.

Here's a contrary view.


The early church fathers Clement of Alexandria, Athanasius, and Augustine all understood the unnatural act as being non-coital intercourse, that is, oral or anal sex.[n.4] They understood ‘natural use of the female’ in v.27 as referring to penile/vaginal intercourse, and they read that back, ‘likewise’, into v.26b: the females exchanged natural, coital intercourse (with men) for unnatural, non-coital intercourse (with men); and the males, in the same way, exchanged natural, coital intercourse with women for non-coital intercourse with other men.

By this reading only the male exchange was homosexual – the church fathers did not read ‘homosexual’ back into the previous verse but ‘non-coital intercourse’. James Olthuis notes, “Paul does not say ‘women with women’ (as he says ‘men with men’)” in the next verse.[n.5] This is critical because without a specific indication that the females exchanged male for female sex partners, Paul’s original audience would not have understood this thin phrase as referring to lesbianism. There is no example in antiquity in which female homosexuality is described as counterpart to male homosexuality (as some suggest here). Lesbianism was seldom mentioned in ancient literature, and it wasn’t even prohibited in the Hebrew Bible or rabbinic tradition. Introducing a new idea here, contrary to cultural expectation, would not have served Paul’s rhetorical purpose. James Miller concludes, “a homosexual reading of verse 26 is in no way warranted. The obvious partner for the woman in verse 26 is male and the relationship is heterosexual.”
 

RedViking

Nord of the South
Joined
Feb 23, 2012
Messages
58,424
A homosexual lifestyle is sin according to the scriptures. Doesn't give you the right the attack and hate homosexuals and make up your own facts to support you hatred. According to the sensationalist media he said:
“Why should we be tolerant of their criminal lifestyle? Ninety-nine percent of paedophiles stem from homosexuality.
“I'm saying so because it is proven that 99% of the paedophiles have a homosexual background. They are blaming their previous lifestyle on what happened. Go and read up on it.”


However if it is preached in church homosexuality is a sin and you don't like it. Leave.

Also why only target and show hatred towards one 'type of sinner'?
 

surface

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 23, 2006
Messages
26,679
That's the issue most religions have moved with the times but then a small subset will pick and choose what they want to be militant about.
You mean people that pretend to follow the religions moved on with times. Scriptures can't change.
 

SAguy

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 4, 2013
Messages
10,636
That's in contradiction to gods word.
God's word as you understand it, what about how others understand it.
If we started taking everything said in the bible about certain laws literally and applying them to today's time, we'd be in a heap of trouble.
 

SAguy

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 4, 2013
Messages
10,636
"You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination."
"If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them."
So all Christians should live their lives according to Leviticus then? That's a bit silly don't you think
 

ponder

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 22, 2005
Messages
92,881
God's word as you understand it, what about how others understand it.
If we started taking everything said in the bible about certain laws literally and applying them to today's time, we'd be in a heap of trouble.

Which comes down to the hypocritical cherry picking.
 
Top