Nick333
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2005
- Messages
- 35,114
Don't you know viruses were invented by the anti - virus industry?
Don't you know viruses were invented by the anti - virus industry?
Well he was until he accidentally smoked a joint laced with vaccinations. Now he has the autisms.Dude, Swa is a immunologist didn't you know that.
It just seems like another double standard.Not funny at all, research and development of future medicines needs to be funded.
It just seems like another double standard.
Did you even read that properly? It confirms what I said. It lists allergy as a side effect. Allergies usually present in the form of rashes or prophylaxis. Those are not the reactions I am talking about. In addition to allergy it also lists other side effects like coughing and sore throat. These are the exact same symptoms as flu itself and it isn't surprising considering the vaccine tricks the body into fighting the virus without a live version being present.yep some people should get educated
Directly from the CDC website
http://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/qa/misconceptions.htm
http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/side-effects.htm#flu
To make it easier for you I have just taken out some snippets for you and bolded the important parts, but I suppose the CDC don't know what they are talking about and/or just in big pharma's pocket.
The reaction to the vaccine you are talking about is probably people being allergic to the vaccine which can happen.
Perhaps I should have worded it better. In medicine there is such a thing as causes. While the flu vaccine doesn't supply a replicating flu virus it can cause a virus your body is successfully able to fight otherwise to replicate and cause disease. This is a documented phenomenon. People who have infection are more susceptible to secondary infections because their immune system is taxed. The vaccine uses exactly the same system to accomplish immunity so it also taxes your immune system and exposes you to risk of other infections.Also this quote doesn't even make sense. So the vaccine gives you the flu but you don't get it from the vaccine?![]()
That one side is allowed to make a living but you won't afford the other side the same. You are also ignoring the bad track record of the pharmaceutical industry.What? That people who invest billions of dollars in research and development should get a return enabling them to develop the next generation of remedies.
VS
Website Crackpot who threatens to undo decades of improved health through unsubstantiated rubbish?
That one side is allowed to make a living but you won't afford the other side the same.
You are also ignoring the bad track record of the pharmaceutical industry.
Back in 2011, biologist and vaccination sceptic Stefan Lanka posted a notice on the internet saying that if anyone could send him scientific evidence proving the measles virus, he would pay them €100,000.
This is exactly what doctor David Bardens did, emailing the biologist a comprehensive study published in a renowned journal on the measles virus.
However Lanka then refused to pay the sum, which is why the matter ended up in court. On Thursday the regional court in Ravensburg in southern Germany ruled that the sceptic must cough up because all the criteria of his advertisement have been fulfilled.
Did you even read that properly? It confirms what I said. It lists allergy as a side effect. Allergies usually present in the form of rashes or prophylaxis. Those are not the reactions I am talking about. In addition to allergy it also lists other side effects like coughing and sore throat. These are the exact same symptoms as flu itself and it isn't surprising considering the vaccine tricks the body into fighting the virus without a live version being present.
Perhaps I should have worded it better. In medicine there is such a thing as causes. While the flu vaccine doesn't supply a replicating flu virus it can cause a virus your body is successfully able to fight otherwise to replicate and cause disease. This is a documented phenomenon. People who have infection are more susceptible to secondary infections because their immune system is taxed. The vaccine uses exactly the same system to accomplish immunity so it also taxes your immune system and exposes you to risk of other infections.
While the flu vaccine doesn't supply a replicating flu virus it can cause a virus your body is successfully able to fight otherwise to replicate and cause disease
Not funny at all, research and development of future medicines needs to be funded.
OK just to point this out 12 424 out of 23 million is 0.05%.Wow, now facts come from the Joker... how ironic!
http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/Vaccines/HPV/jama.html - "There were a total of 12,424 reports to VAERS of adverse events following HPV vaccination through December 2008"
Yay more Naturalnews!! Keep clicking, the Health Ranger wants to add another zero to his account balance. Buy some Y2K safety protection products while you're at it. Maybe some of those balance bracelets too. Jet fuel can't melt steel beams guys!because I am obviously a shill for someone who makes thousands of dollars (very stupid of me not to rather support the 100 billion dollar vaccine industry) I must post the next good/fun/flame read.
Just to keep porchrat in the money you know, because it looks like he works for the big bux guys.
http://www.naturalnews.com/048974_vaccines_culture_war_medical_tyranny.html
0.05% bud. 0.05%. You linked to the numbers yourself. Be honest, do you think that is a significant percentage yes or no?
0.05% bud. 0.05%. You linked to the numbers yourself. Be honest, do you think that is a significant percentage yes or no?