Unhappy438
Honorary Master
- Joined
- May 25, 2011
- Messages
- 24,915
Im interested in this shilling PhleeBag keeps mentioning, where can i sign up, i could do with the extra money.
Im interested in this shilling PhleeBag keeps mentioning, where can i sign up, i could do with the extra money.
I think Porchy knows. He has shown great commitment over the years.
Busted![]()
I do find it rather ironic that the person throwing around the shill accusation has an account that posts in this thread exclusively and is a clone.
Except that it's not. Empirical evidence needs a control. So where is it?The safety angle is supported by arguably the most powerful epidemiological evidence ever assembled. Remember massive portions of the world's population are getting vaccinated.
Statistically speaking most of those vaccines have fewer negative reactions than aspirin. Safe is obviously a relative term as all things in life carry risk. I feel it is reasonable to say that if something you're taking has been demonstrated over countless administrations to be less likely to invoke a negative reaction than aspirin, that it is "safe".
ROFLOL. Piss poor response. And who is "you guys"?There is risk in anything you do. You sitting and typing at your computer poses a risk to you as your chair can break and you fall and break your back, or you hit a key at the wrong angle and you break your finger, you eating or drinking anything comes with a risk. Science cannot and will not eliminate all risk, but it can help reduce the risk (of which Vaccines do considerably).
And none of the people, who I know who are pro vaccines, disclaim that there is no risk in vaccines however a 1 in 1 million chance of having an adverse reaction to vaccines is a a huge improvement over the countless deaths of people caused when vaccines were not available. so you have a much bigger chance of being struck by lightening than having a reaction to a vaccine.
Maybe you guys should just stick to creating web pages and stay off the nut job conspiracy sites
Not all forms of studies use a traditional control like "Bobby got the drug and Sarah didn't because Sarah is the control". We were taught those basic models in high school sure but that is an extremely simplistic way of looking at science. This is particularly true when it comes to epidemiology. Where on Earth did you get your degree that they taught you that garbage?!?Except that it's not. Empirical evidence needs a control. So where is it?
The scientific method is not crap. But you are one of those that don't care to throw it away when it suits you. There's no control period. Diseases like autism are going up. Coinciding with vaccination increases. You could send anti-vaxxers on their way. Except that you can't because you don't have the science to differentiate between correlation or causation.Not all forms of studies need a traditional control like "Bobby got the drug and Sarah didn't because Sarah is the control". We were taught those basic models in high school sure but that is an extremely simplistic way of looking at science. This is particularly true when it comes to epidemiology. Where on Earth did you get your degree that they taught you that garbage?!?
(my word I remember why I had you on ignore now, constantly spouting crap about things you have little to no knowledge of)
Christ just go educate yourself on how causation is determined in epidemiological investigations and stop wasting everyone's time with this garbage you spout from a position of ignorance. It would be funny if it wasn't so bloody pathetic. Why do you feel the need to comment on things you so obviously know little to nothing about???The scientific method is not crap. But you are one of those that don't care to throw it away when it suits you. There's no control period. Diseases like autism are going up. Coinciding with vaccination increases. You could send anti-vaxxers on their way. Except that you can't because you don't have the science to differentiate between correlation or causation.
Yes put the truth on ignore again. Plain ignorance. Simple fact here is that you can't determine the answer from the available data. This is not the same as an epidemiological study but it obviously suits the pharmaceutical industry that there's no certainty either way.Christ just go educate yourself on how causation is determined in epidemiological investigations and stop wasting everyone's time with this garbage you spout from a position of ignorance. It would be funny if it wasn't so bloody pathetic. Why do you feel the need to comment on things you so obviously know little to nothing about???
Welcome back to the ignore list you frustratingly ignorant goon.
Welcome back to the ignore list you frustratingly ignorant goon.
Software expert stuck in the stone age,Jeez, i almost forgot about Swa hes been on my ignore list for so long. I see he is still trolling around.
Isn't it past your bedtime yet?So two people here with nothing to contribute other than their trolling....
Are we going to get childish now?Isn't it past your bedtime yet?