Any Anti-Vaccine People on MyBB?

Unhappy438

Honorary Master
Joined
May 25, 2011
Messages
24,915
Im interested in this shilling PhleeBag keeps mentioning, where can i sign up, i could do with the extra money.
 

Pox

Expert Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2005
Messages
3,679
I do find it rather ironic that the person throwing around the shill accusation has an account that posts in this thread exclusively and is a clone.

Shhhh. Don't chase our free entertainment away.
 

Swa

Honorary Master
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
31,215
The safety angle is supported by arguably the most powerful epidemiological evidence ever assembled. Remember massive portions of the world's population are getting vaccinated.

Statistically speaking most of those vaccines have fewer negative reactions than aspirin. Safe is obviously a relative term as all things in life carry risk. I feel it is reasonable to say that if something you're taking has been demonstrated over countless administrations to be less likely to invoke a negative reaction than aspirin, that it is "safe".
Except that it's not. Empirical evidence needs a control. So where is it?

There is risk in anything you do. You sitting and typing at your computer poses a risk to you as your chair can break and you fall and break your back, or you hit a key at the wrong angle and you break your finger, you eating or drinking anything comes with a risk. Science cannot and will not eliminate all risk, but it can help reduce the risk (of which Vaccines do considerably).

And none of the people, who I know who are pro vaccines, disclaim that there is no risk in vaccines however a 1 in 1 million chance of having an adverse reaction to vaccines is a a huge improvement over the countless deaths of people caused when vaccines were not available. so you have a much bigger chance of being struck by lightening than having a reaction to a vaccine.

Maybe you guys should just stick to creating web pages and stay off the nut job conspiracy sites
ROFLOL. Piss poor response. And who is "you guys"? :confused:
 

porchrat

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Messages
34,277
Except that it's not. Empirical evidence needs a control. So where is it?
Not all forms of studies use a traditional control like "Bobby got the drug and Sarah didn't because Sarah is the control". We were taught those basic models in high school sure but that is an extremely simplistic way of looking at science. This is particularly true when it comes to epidemiology. Where on Earth did you get your degree that they taught you that garbage?!?

(my word I remember why I had you on ignore now, constantly spouting crap about things you have little to no knowledge of)
 
Last edited:

Swa

Honorary Master
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
31,215
Not all forms of studies need a traditional control like "Bobby got the drug and Sarah didn't because Sarah is the control". We were taught those basic models in high school sure but that is an extremely simplistic way of looking at science. This is particularly true when it comes to epidemiology. Where on Earth did you get your degree that they taught you that garbage?!?

(my word I remember why I had you on ignore now, constantly spouting crap about things you have little to no knowledge of)
The scientific method is not crap. But you are one of those that don't care to throw it away when it suits you. There's no control period. Diseases like autism are going up. Coinciding with vaccination increases. You could send anti-vaxxers on their way. Except that you can't because you don't have the science to differentiate between correlation or causation.
 

porchrat

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Messages
34,277
The scientific method is not crap. But you are one of those that don't care to throw it away when it suits you. There's no control period. Diseases like autism are going up. Coinciding with vaccination increases. You could send anti-vaxxers on their way. Except that you can't because you don't have the science to differentiate between correlation or causation.
Christ just go educate yourself on how causation is determined in epidemiological investigations and stop wasting everyone's time with this garbage you spout from a position of ignorance. It would be funny if it wasn't so bloody pathetic. Why do you feel the need to comment on things you so obviously know little to nothing about???

Creationist, an anti-vaxxer and a 12 year old's understanding of how epidemiology works (all science needs a control like we were taught in grade 9 herp derp :p). It's like winning anti-science bingo. :rolleyes:

Welcome back to the ignore list you frustratingly ignorant goon.
 
Last edited:

Swa

Honorary Master
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
31,215
Christ just go educate yourself on how causation is determined in epidemiological investigations and stop wasting everyone's time with this garbage you spout from a position of ignorance. It would be funny if it wasn't so bloody pathetic. Why do you feel the need to comment on things you so obviously know little to nothing about???

Welcome back to the ignore list you frustratingly ignorant goon.
Yes put the truth on ignore again. Plain ignorance. Simple fact here is that you can't determine the answer from the available data. This is not the same as an epidemiological study but it obviously suits the pharmaceutical industry that there's no certainty either way.
 

Hamster

Resident Rodent
Joined
Aug 22, 2006
Messages
42,920
Jeez, i almost forgot about Swa hes been on my ignore list for so long. I see he is still trolling around.
Software expert stuck in the stone age,
Share trading expert angry because his grocery money isn't being released fast enough,
Scientist and medical expert

...yeah, he's still going strong.
 

Swa

Honorary Master
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
31,215
So two people here with nothing to contribute other than their trolling....
 
Top