killadoob said:
well if its such gonna be a kuk game why worry lol
I don't know if it will be *** or good, since I haven't played it yet.
killadoob said:
you think the graphics is bad eish u must be loading it on low res because what i saw is awesome vga
Didn't say the graphics were bad, just nothing WOW. Look at the E3 video for Unreal 3, that is WOW. BT2 doesn't have WOW for me. But then again as you say it may be the videos themselves. So lets wait for the final game to decide on graphics.
killadoob said:
apart from css what game voip?
Off the top of my head UT2k3, UT2k4, Splinter Cell 2 and 3, Joint Ops, and every single XBox live game (not that we can play them but it's for explanation of the point). But there has been things like Ventrilo and Roger Wilco for years giving voip to all games anyway for years (used to play ut99 ctf games with roger wilco).
killadoob said:
well ive played bf vietnam and ive played bf 1942 same game play so why wouldnt it be better?
I dunno. UT2k3 game play was not better than UT99. I'm also still in two minds about which of BF:1942 and BF:Vietnam I found had better game play.
killadoob said:
do you play bf 1942 i hope you do or you would be going on about something you know nothing about.
Play both BF:1942 and BF:Vietnam.
killadoob said:
so if you play a demo and its not good the game is gonna differ?
UT2k3 demo was great, actual game not so.
Ridd!ck demo was great, game was great.
Siphon Filter demo was terrible, game was much better
GTR demo wouldn't run, final game did
What I am saying is you can not use a demo as a hard and fast rule of the quality of the game. Sometimes it is and other times not.