Shake&Bake
Party Liaison
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2007
- Messages
- 22,254
By Claire Bates of The Daily Mail.
Last updated at 2:46 PM on 23rd February 2010
Apple has purged more than 5,000 'overtly sexual' applications after receiving complaints from parents and software developers that they are crowding out the popular App store.
However, the move has provoked fury among smaller developers who point out that similar risque content from bigger brands has not been banned.
The Apple App store has been a major draw for customers, with three billion Apps downloaded since it launched in July 2008.
There are now 140,000 software applications, most costing no more than a couple of pounds. They vary from time-wasting games to digital books and useful tools.
Then last week, Apple e-mailed a number of developers telling them their Apps were being removed as they did not conform with new content guidelines.
One such app is called Wobble iBoobs, where users can 'wobble' parts of a bikini-clad model.
Its developer Jon Atherton said the Apple removal notice noted: 'We have recently received numerous complaints from our customers about this type of content and have changed our guidelines appropriately.
wobble
The Wobble iBoob application was one of more than 5,000 to be taken down from the Apple store over the weekend
'We have decided to remove any overtly sexual content from the App Store, which includes your application.'
When asked for more specific guidelines Mr Atherton said he was told no images of women in bikinis would be allowed.
This was backed up by the British developers of the 'Simply Beach' App.
They were surprised when the computer pulled their online shopping application because its pictures of girls in kaftans and bikinis were deemed too risque.
Managing director Gerrard Dennis said: 'You can see much worse at your local swimming pool.
'I hope that the women who buy and wear our products do feel sexy in them, but it's not the sort of thing men would download in order to ogle.
'The e-mail arrived straight to a junk mail folder on Friday and at first we thought it was a spam joke.
'We then checked iTunes to find the App had in fact been removed. It seems like political correctness gone mad.'
Apple executive Phil Schiller said they had removed around three per cent of the Apps as they were unsuitable for family viewing and they had 'to put the needs of the kids and parents first'.
Strangely, a number of 'sexy' applications featuring scantily-clad models from Sports Illustrated have not been banned.
When challenged about this inconsistency, Mr Schilling said the source of the App was also taken into consideratio
'The difference is this is a well-known company with previously published material available broadly in a well-accepted format,' he told the New York Times. *coff* *Booshet* coff*
Analysts said Apple are making sure the App Store doesn't scare off new customers as their products go mainstream.
They are hoping their new iPad tablet computer will be a family product and used as an educational tool.
Gene Munster, an analyst at Piper Jaffray, said: 'At the end of the day, Apple has a brand to maintain. The bottom line is they want that image to be squeaky clean.'
Yet another reason why I don't bother with Apple.
How ludicrous?
Why then not have a risque section in the Itunes store?
Or sell iPhones for minors and adults?
Thereby restricting access for kids, Mormons, the Amish and people whom are seemingly offended by these heinous apps...
Come on Steve Jobs? There's a free avenue for you take - create yet another clone of your 1-task-at-a-time wonder for kids and adults alike - you can have that on me
Developers have a hard time (I'd imagine) as it is, now they get the boot?!?
More from PC World
Apple Explains Sexy App Double Standard
Sarah Jacobsson, PC World
Apple's ban on sexy apps -- more than 5000 apps were removed from the app store over the weekend because they contained "overtly sexual content" -- has been making headlines, mostly because of the selectivity of the removal.
While Apple removed such risqué apps as Strip Simon and Video Strip Poker, apps from big-name companies such as Sports Illustrated and Playboy remain in the App Store -- the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit App is even featured on the front page.
Apple attempted to explain its app double-standard in an interview with the New York Times. Apple's head of worldwide product marketing, Phillip Schiller, told the Times on Monday that the source and intent of apps were taken into consideration when the ban was applied. Well-established companies with "previously published material available broadly in a well-accepted format" (e.g. magazines like Playboy, FHM, and Sports Illustrated) are not held to the same rigorous constraints as unknown apps like Tight Body Perky Boobs and SlideHer Nautica.
It would appear that Apple's restriction on sexy (and subsequent lenience on well-established companies) extends to shopping apps -- the Simply Beach App, which is a bikini-shopping app that features pictures of women in bikinis (or modeling "products"), was taken down on Friday as part of the ban. The Simply Beach App was reinstated, without any official communication from Apple, today. Meanwhile the Victoria's Secret All Access App remained in the App Store all weekend, untouched.
Apple maintains that it's really doing all of this for the kids -- trying to keep the App Store a family-friendly place that won't scare off potential customers.
If Apple's doing this for the kids, it's failing -- the App Store isn't 100 percent "family friendly" as long as publications like Playboy remain in the mix (still waiting for the argument on how a soft-core porn mag is not "overtly sexual"), and all the new policy really does is give the shaft to independent developers.
Developers already have a hard time getting their apps approved for the App Store with Apple's rigorous rules and regulations, and now they have to put up with corporate schmoozing and puritanical sex bans as well? It might be time to look into developing Android apps . .