Rocket-Boy
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2007
- Messages
- 10,199
XP and 2000 gave the the most *** of any OS. Mac OS X the least.
Thats probably because all 15 people running it were too ignorant to report the problems
XP and 2000 gave the the most *** of any OS. Mac OS X the least.
Damn [-]PC[/-] Apple users are so [-]insecure[/-] arrogant.
Its like comparing a Sharp Elsimate calculator - with fixed functions to a programmable HP calculator with dynamic functions.
I'm sorry that's just trolling.Thats probably because all 15 people running it were too ignorant to report the problems![]()
I've found with OS X that there are way more high-quality apps compared to Windows. Really Windows has nothing on software like Pixelmator, Coda, Transmit, BBEdit not to mention Logic, Final Cut Studio, Aperture ...Yes, you may find that as more and more application run services in the background your responsiveness get affected on NT5 systems. That is just the nature of its highly dynamic abilities. What you describe there with your OSX scenario is pretty much all the apps ever made for OSX running at the same time. Because they have such tight control over the OS and what people run in it they can build it so that the system remains responsive even when you use every feature it has to offer or comes bundled with.
Because they have such tight control over the OS and what people run in it they can build it so that the system remains responsive even when you use every feature it has to offer or comes bundled with.