Aussies cant stand the heat..so they start cheating

D

Devill

Damned
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
26,822
That was a mistake but them going on the offensive and calling Vetorri's comment a "low blow" is just to much.

Man up and admit you made a mistake etc etc.... :mad:
 
K

kiepie

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2006
Messages
6,752
Seriously, he must have felt the gloves touching the stumps...
Bad sportsmanship! :mad:
 
K

killadoob

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 30, 2004
Messages
46,571
Aussies did this in india as well, they had an agreement saying if they did not catch something they would man up and on 2 occasions they said they caught it when they clearly did not on the replay's.

The shocking thing is he knew full well what happened, cheating is cheating and i think he should get like a 4 match ban or something for cheating, possibly 6-12 months. So he cheats and they still lose karma will get you :p
 
G

Guest 20221009

Guest
if Boucher had clipped the bails off whilst Warner was facing, hell would have been unleashed! McGrath would have been all over the show and their media would have called for the death chamber..

Well, its one of their own right now and they all getting defensive. The sqaure leg empire probably missed it, cos that is a clear no ball.
 
rwenzori

rwenzori

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 17, 2006
Messages
12,360
The Oz are always a bit slimy, and cheat or bend rules where they can. Their umpires too - remember Darrell Hair way back when giving us out on balls pitching a foot outside leg. Same in their rugby. It's win at all costs.
 
I

I am Penguin

Executive Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2009
Messages
7,713
HypoThesis said:
+1

This just infuriates me even more...


Here's the full story...

http://www.smh.com.au/news/sport/cr...ori-im-no-cheat/2009/02/02/1233423102976.html

And they wonder why the rest of the cricket world hates them so much?
Click to expand...

What infuriates me even more is their denial of wrong doing after the clear evidence circles the globe. The fact that his hands is on the wrong side of the wickets is already very suspicious to say the least. Can anyone believe that he did not intentionally grab the ball with his hand on the wrong side of the wickets? What was his hands doing on the wrong side in the first place. They should ban him from the game.
 
Last edited:
K

killadoob

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 30, 2004
Messages
46,571
I reckon if i go to any of the one dayers or pro's i'm going to make a sign that clearly says what a cheater he is.
 
G

Guest 20221009

Guest
This number 2 side in the world is starting to work on my nerves.
Can't wait for them to come over here (production of lasers for spectators to use on them is going well - on sale at a robot near you soon!)
Click to expand...

Bwahaha :D
 
D

Devill

Damned
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
26,822
"Haddin is positive the ball hit the bail before deflecting into his hands, although the Kiwis believe he knocked off the bails with his gloves: "I was unaware at the time that my hands were in front of the stumps. After looking at the replay my hands were in front of the stumps, but the ball I am 100 per cent sure hit the bails first then came up into my gloves," he said.
Click to expand...

Does it freaking matter? NO!

Hands infront of the stumps = No ball!

Idiot freaking Aussie:mad:
 
B

Boces

Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2009
Messages
22
The crims are imploding - oh my bleeding heart.

Now they're resting Ponting - 'resting' being the well-known crim slang for 'you seem a bit rubbish at this captaincy lark, do you mind if we let someone else have a go?'
 
B

Boces

Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2009
Messages
22
The super-awesome Darrell Hair:

FORMER Test umpire Darrell Hair said yesterday Neil Broom should definitely have been given not out and that it was "unfortunate" wicketkeeper Brad Haddin hadn't admitted his infringement.

"It's quite clear-cut. His [Haddin's] gloves were in front of the stumps and the ball hadn't passed the line of stumps, so he's in breach of the law and it should have just been an automatic no-ball," said Hair, now executive officer of the NSW Cricket Umpires and Scorers Association.

"Of all the people on the ground, he would have been the one who was best positioned to know. I think he should have owned up to it. I saw that [Ricky] Ponting has gone into bat for him after the Kiwis called him [Haddin] a cheat, but I can understand why the Kiwis would be livid about it."

The responsibility for detecting Haddin's encroachment lay with square leg umpire Bruce Oxenford. "People think the square leg umpire is out there for a rest, but the most important thing the square leg umpire is out there to look for are the things that happen the least and that's hit wicket and the wicketkeeper encroaching," Hair said.

"It should have just been called a no-ball from the square leg umpire … You can't be stumped and you can't be bowled off a no-ball. But it's obvious that the ball missed the stump as well."
Click to expand...
 
K

killadoob

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 30, 2004
Messages
46,571
The stupid thing is what did haddin think would happen when everyone saw the 10000FPS slow motion replays they have these days.

It's obvious to every single person including the aussie supporters he cheated. Stupid ass.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top