Austria sues European Union, claiming natural gas and nuclear energy are not 'green'

[ToxicBunny]

How so?

You are quite literally unable to grasp it, so there is no point in trying to explain it.. you will just play Pidgeon at a Chess Game and try claim victory.

 

[Ponderer]

You are quite literally unable to grasp it, so there is no point in trying to explain it.. you will just play Pidgeon at a Chess Game and try claim victory.

What is it that I'm unable to grasp?
Surely you can point it out?
Unless of course you can't.

 

[Pak Fa Fui]

In other related news, hydro dams in Europe have been drying up due to the heatwaves and unable to generate the power needed for winter and to make it worse, less water will freeze easier

 

[Spizz]

What is it that I'm unable to grasp?
Surely you can point it out?
Unless of course you can't.

Oh the irony

And once again you prove me right from the start of the thread.

As @ToxicBunny says, you are a complete waste of time and energy.

 

[wingnut771]

In other related news, hydro dams in Europe have been drying up due to the heatwaves and unable to generate the power needed for winter and to make it worse, less water will freeze easier

Don't worry, in 11 years the sun will cool down.

 

[ToxicBunny]

What is it that I'm unable to grasp?
Surely you can point it out?
Unless of course you can't.

Basic reality is beyond you.

But to humour you to some level, CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere are an element, but CO2 has an outsized impact due to its nature and its ability to retain and refract heat back into the atmosphere. And for reference I am massively oversimplify the mechanics at play here because I seriously doubt you would understand wavelengths and how each one interacts with molecules differently and has different impacts.

 

[Moosedrool]

The percentage of CO2 in our atmosphere is only about 0.03%
It does not take a genius to figure out that it's contribution to the "greenhouse effect" is minimal - even negligible.

It's actually 0.04% growing closer to 0.05%

Inject yourself with 200 cc of rat poison if you're so convinced that 0.04% is negligible. I mean you have 5l of blood in your body right?

 

[Ponderer]

Basic reality is beyond you.

But to humour you to some level, CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere are an element, but CO2 has an outsized impact due to its nature and its ability to retain and refract heat back into the atmosphere.

LOL @ "outsized impact".
Seriously?

 

[ToxicBunny]

LOL @ "outsized impact".
Seriously?

Yup, as I said, beyond you to grasp.

 

[Ponderer]

It's actually 0.04% growing closer to 0.05%

Inject yourself with 200 cc of rat poison if you're so convinced that 0.04% is negligible. I mean you have 5l of blood in your body right?

It is ridiculously absurd reasoning, and you know it.
Unless of course you don't know just how absurd it is.

 

[wingnut771]

LOL @ "outsized impact".
Seriously?

 

[Ponderer]

Yup, as I said, beyond you to grasp.

LOL

 

[wingnut771]

It is ridiculously absurd reasoning, and you know it.
Unless of course you don't know just how absurd it is.

 

[Moosedrool]

It is ridiculously absurd reasoning, and you know it.
Unless of course you don't know just how absurd it is.

No your reasoning around the 0.04% co2 in the atmosphere being negligible is garbage.

Conveniently for this argument. Just like the paint on your car weighing around 40kg. Let’s make an example for simplicity. A 1 ton car with 40kg black paint.

You see how your logic is not logical at all?

 

[wingnut771]

The percentage of CO2 in our atmosphere is only about 0.03%
It does not take a genius to figure out that it's contribution to the "greenhouse effect" is minimal - even negligible.

**** me, how do the plants/plankton survive?

 

[Ponderer]

No your reasoning around the 0.04% co2 in the atmosphere being negligible is garbage.

Conveniently for this argument. Just like the paint on your car weighing around 40kg. Let’s make an example for simplicity. A 1 ton car with 40kg black paint.

You see how your logic is not logical at all?

No, I don't see it.
It is however obvious, and there for everyone else to see, just how absurd this line of reasoning of yours is.

 

[Ponderer]

**** me, how do the plants/plankton survive?

Is that a genuine question?

 

[wingnut771]

Is that a genuine question?

Am I not allowed to ask questions?

 

[Moosedrool]

No, I don't see it.
It is however obvious, and there for everyone else to see, just how absurd this line of reasoning of yours is.

Everyone else?

Also explain how absurd the reasoning is so that we can all have another laugh at your "logic".

 

[ToxicBunny]

No, I don't see it.
It is however obvious, and there for everyone else to see, just how absurd this line of reasoning of yours is.

Please do break how you define this line of reasoning as absurd.